Better informed training of latent syntactic features

COLING/ACL 2006 - EMNLP 2006: 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 317-326

  Dreyer, Markus ^a   Eisner, Jason ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

ANNEALING METHODS; LINGUISTIC CONSTRAINTS; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; MODEL SIZE; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; TREEBANKS; UNSUPERVISED METHOD; YIELD IMPROVEMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 56149105269     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610120     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Berger, P. Brown, S. Pietra, V. Pietra, J. Lafferty, H. Printz, and L. Ures. 1994. The CANDIDE system for machine translation.
2. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, Robert Mac-Intyre, Victoria Tredinnick, Grace Kim, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Britta Schasberger. 1995. Bracketing guidelines for Treebank II style: Penn Treebank project. Technical Report MS-CIS-95-06, University of Pennsylvania, January.
3. John Blatz and Jason Eisner. 2006. Transforming parsing algorithms and other weighted logic programs. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Formal Grammar.
4. Eugene Charniak. 1996. Tree-bank grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
5. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 598-603.
6. David Chiang and Daniel M. Bikel. 2002. Recovering latent information in treebanks. In COLING 2002: The 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Taipei.
7. Michael John Collins. 1996. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. In ACL-96, pages 184-191, Santa Cruz, CA. ACL.
8. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 16-23, Madrid. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Jason Eisner, Eric Goldlust, and Noah A. Smith. 2005. Compiling comp ling: Weighted dynamic programming and the Dyna language. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 281-290, Vancouver, October.
10. Jason Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In COLING96: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 340-345, Copenhagen. Center for Sprogteknologi.
11. Gal Elidan and Nir Friedman. 2003. The information bottleneck EM algorithm. In Proceedings of UAI.
12. Joshua Goodman. 1997. Probabilistic feature grammars. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 89-100, MIT, Cambridge, MA, September.
13. L. Huang and D. Chiang. 2005. Parsing and κ-best algorithms. In Proc. of IWPT.
14. Mark Johnson. 1998. PCFG models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics, 24(4):613-632.
15. Ronald M. Kaplan and Joan Bresnan. 1982. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Joan Bresnan, editor, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pages 173-281. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2001. Distributional phrase structure induction. In The Fifth Conference on Natural Language Learning.
17. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Erhard Hinrichs and Dan Roth, editors, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
18. K. Lari and S. Young. 1990. The estimation of stochastic context-free grammars using the inside-outside algorithm. Computer Speech and Language, 4:35-56.
19. David M. Magerman. 1995. Statistical Decision-Tree models for parsing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 276-283, Cambridge, Mass.
20. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330, June.
21. Takuya Matsuzaki, Yusuke Miyao, and Junichi Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic CFG with latent annotations. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), University of Michigan.
22. Fernando Pereira and Yves Schabes. 1992. Inside-Outside reestimation from partially bracketed corpora. In Proceedings of the 30th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pges 128-135, Newark. University of Delaware.
23. Fernando Pereira, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. 1993. Distributional clustering of English words. In Proceedings of ACL, Ohio State University.
24. Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Detlef Prescher. 2005. Head-driven PCFGs with latent-head statistics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 115-124, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October.
26. Stefan Riezler. 1998. Statistical inference and probabilistic modeling for constraint-based NLP. In B. Schröder, W. Lenders, W. Hess, and T. Portele, editors, Computers, Linguistics, and Phonetics between Language and Speech: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS' 98), pages 111-124, Bonn. Lang.
27. Kenneth Rose. 1998. Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 80:2210-2239, November.
28. Noah A. Smith and Jason Eisner. 2006. Annealing structural bias in multilingual weighted grammar induction. In Proceedings of ACL.