Planning: Supporting and optimizing clinical guidelines execution

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 139, Issue , 2008, Pages 101-120

  Anselma, Luca ^a   Montani, Stefania ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Artificial intelligence; Decision support; Indeterminacy; Optimized CG execution; Planning; Resources; Time; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; PLANNING;

ADAPTATION; DECISION SUPPORTS; INDETERMINACY; OPTIMIZED CG EXECUTION; RESOURCES; TIME; UNCERTAINTY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TIME;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 56149099919     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-873-1-101     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. D. Nau, M. Ghallab, P. Traverso, Automated planning: theory and practice, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
2. L. Anselma, S. Montani, Planning, Technical Report 101/07, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino, Italy (2007) (available at http://www.di.unito.it/~anselma/pdf/Planning-TR101-07.pdf)
3. R. Fikes, N. Nilsson, STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving, Artificial Intelligence 2 (1971), 189-208.
4. A. Blum, M. Furst, Fast planning through planning graph analysis, Artificial Intelligence 90 (1997), 281-300.
5. D. Weld, An introduction to least-commitment planning, Artificial Intelligence Magazine (1994), 27-61.
6. H. Kautz, B. Selman, Pushing the envelope: planning, propositional logic and stochastic search, in Proc. 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1996), 1194-1201.
7. H. Kautz, B. Selman, Unifying SAT-based and graph-based planning, in Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial intelligence (IJCAI'99) (1999), 318-325.
8. K. Erol, J. Hendler, D. S. Nau, UMCP: A sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task-network planning, in Proc. International Conference on AI Planning Systems (AIPS) (1994), 249-254.
9. K. Erol, J. Hendler, D. Nau, HTN Planning: Complexity and expressivity, in Proc. AAAI 1994 (1994), 1123-1128.
10. R. Dechter, Constraint processing, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003.
11. R. Dechter, I. Meiri, J. Pearl, Temporal constraint networks, Artificial Intelligence, 49 (1991), 61-95.
12. D. E. Smith, J. Frank, A. K. Jónsson, Bridging the gap between planning and scheduling, Knowledge Engineering Review 15(1) (2000), 47-83.
13. C. Boutilier, T. Dean, S. Hanks, Decision-theoretic planning: structural assumptions and computational leverage, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 (1999), 1-94.
14. L. P. Kaelbling, M. L. Littman, A. R. Cassandra., Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains, Artificial Intelligence 101(1-2) (1998), 99-134.
15. F. W. Trevizan, F. Gagliardi Cozman, L. Nunes de Barros, Planning under risk and knightian uncertainty, in Proc. IJCAI 2007 (2007), 2023-2028.
16. K. L. Myers, CPEF: a continuous planning and execution framework, AI Magazine, 20(4) (1999), 63-70.
17. P.E. Friedland, Y. Iwasaki, The concept and implementation of skeletal plans, Journal of Automated Reasoning 1(2) (1985), 161-208.
18. S. Montani, P. Terenziani, Exploiting decision theory concepts within clinical guideline systems: towards a general approach, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 21 (2006), 585-599.
19. S. Miksch, Plan management in the medical domain, AI Communications 12(4) (1999), 209-235.
20. M. Peleg, S. Tu, J. Bury, P. Ciccarese, J. Fox, R.A. Greenes, R. Hall, P.D. Johnson, N. Jones, A. Kumar, S. Miksch, S. Quaglini, A. Seyfang, E.H. Shortliffe, M. Stefanelli, Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach, JAMIA 10 (2004), 52-68.
21. A.A. Boxwala, Applying axiomatic design methodology to create guidelines that are locally adaptable, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (2002), 980.
22. M.D. Cabana, C.S.N.R. Rand, C.S. Powe, A.W. Wu,. M.H. Wilson, , P.C. Abboud, H.R Rubin, Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for impro vement, JAMIA 282(15) (1999), 1458-1465.
23. P. Terenziani, S. Montani, A. Bottrighi, M. Torchio, G. Molino, G. Correndo, A context-adaptable approach to clinical guidelines, in Proc. Medinfo (2004), 169-173.
24. M. Peleg, D. Wang, A. Fodor, S. Keren, E. Karnieli, Adaptation of practice guidelines for clinical decision support: a case study of diabetic foot care, in Proc. Workshop on AI techniques in healthcare: evidence-based guidelines and protocols, ECAI (2006).
25. Y. Shahar, S. Miksch, P. Johnson, An intention-based language for representing clinical guidelines, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (1996), 592-596.
26. D.B. Fridsma, J.H. Gennari, M.A. Musen, Making generic guidelines site-specific, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (1996), 597-601.
27. A. Bottrighi, L Anselma, S Montani, P. Terenziani, G. Molino, M. Torchio, Supporting cooperative updates of clinical guidelines, in Proc. Medinfo (2007).
28. P. Terenziani, G. Molino, M. Torchio, A modular approach for representing and executing clinical guidelines, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 23 (2001), 249-276.
29. S. Quaglini, M. Stefanelli, G. Lanzola, V. Caporusso, S. Panzarasa, Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems, Artificial Inteligence in Medicine 22(1) (2001), 65-80.
30. M.A. Musen, S.W. Tu, A.K. Das, Y. Shahar, Eon: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy, JAMIA 6(3) (1996), 367-388.
31. J. Fox, N. Johns, A. Rahmanzadeh, R.Thomson, Disseminating medical knowledge: the proforma approach, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14(1-2) (1998), 157-182.
32. Y. Shahar, S. Miksch, P. Johnson, The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14(1-2) (1998), 29-51.
33. G. Duftschmid, S. Miksch, Knowledge-based verification of clinical guidelines by detection of anomalies, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22 (2001), 23-41.
34. S. Baumler, M. Balser, A. Dunets, W. Reif, J. Schmitt, A verification of medical guidelines by model checking - a case study, in Proc. Model Checking Software SPIN (2006).
35. L. Giordano, P. Terenziani, A. Bottrighi, S. Montani, L. Donzella, Model checking for clinical guidelines: an agent-based approach, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium 2006
36. A. tenTeije et al., Improving medical protocols by formal methods, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 36 (2006), 193-209.
37. S. Montani, Case-based Reasoning for managing non-compliance with clinical guidelines, in Proc. Workshop on CBR in the Health Sciences, International Conference on Case Based Reasoning (2007).
38. M. d'Aquin, J. Lieber, A. Napoli, Adaptation knowledge acquisition: a case study for case-based decision support in oncology, Computational Intelligence 22 (2006), 161-176.
39. C. Marling, D. Whitehouse, Case-based reasoning in the care of Alzheimer's disease patients, in Proc. International Conference on Case-based Reasoning (2001), 702-715.
40. D.W. Bates et al., Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality, JAMIA 10 (2003), 523-530.
41. M. Peleg, S. Tu, A. Manindroo, R.B. Altman, Modeling and analyzing biomedical processes using workflow/petri net models and tools, in Proc. Medinfo (2004), 74-78.
42. L. Dazzi, C. Fassino, R. Saracco, S. Quaglini, & M. Stefanelli, A Patient workflow management system built on guidelines, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (1997).
43. D.Wang, M.Peleg, D.Bu, M.Cantor, G. Landesberg, E. Lunenfeld, S.Tu, G.E.Kaiser, G.Hripcsak, V.Patel, E.H.Shortliffe, Gesdor a generic execution model for sharing of computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (2003), 694-698.
44. S. Montani, P. Terenziani, A. Bottrighi, Supporting therapy selection in computerized clinical guidelines by means of decision theory, in Proc. Medinfo (2007), 855-860.
45. S. Quaglini, M. Stefanelli, A. Cavallini, G. Micieli, C. Fassino, C. Mossa, Guideline-based careflow systems, Artificial Inteligence in Medicine 20(1) (2000), 5-22.
46. L. Ohno-Machado, J.H. Gennari, S. Murphy, N.L. Jain, S.W. Tu, D.E. Oliver, et al., The GuideLine Interchange Format: a model for representing guidelines, JAMIA 5(4) (1998), 357-372.
47. M. Peleg, A.A. Boxwala, et al., GLIF3: the evolution of a Guideline Representation Format, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (2000).
48. C. Gordon, S.I. Herbert, P. Johnson, Knowledge representation and clinical practice guidelines: the DILEMMA and PRESTIGE projects, in Proc. Medical Informatics Europe (1996), 511-515.
49. E. Sherman, G. Hripcsak, J. Starren, R. Jender, P. Clayton, Using intermediate states to improve the ability of Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge, in Proc. Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (1995), 238-242.
50. G. Duftschmid, S. Miksch, W. Gall, Verification of temporal scheduling constraints in clinical practice guidelines, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 25(2) (2002), 93-121.
51. L. Anselma, P. Terenziani, S. Montani A. Bottrighi, Towards a comprehensive treatment of repetitions, periodicity and temporal constraints in clinical guidelines, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 38(2) (2006), 171-195.
52. Y. Shahar, A framework for knowledge-based temporal abstraction in clinical domains, Artificial Intelligence 90(1) (1997), 79-133.
53. R. Kosara, S. Miksch, Metaphors of movement: a visualization and user interface for time-oriented, skeletal plans, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22(2) (2001), 111-131.
54. J. C. Augusto, Temporal reasoning for decision support in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 33(1) (2005), 1-24.
55. P.L. Miller, Expert critiquing systems: practice based medical consultation by computer, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
56. J. van der Lei, Critiquing based on computer stored medical records, PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1991.
57. R. Sips, L. Braun, N. Roos, Applying intention-based guidelines for critiquing, in Proc. Workshop on AI techniques in healthcare: evidence-based guidelines and protocols, ECAI 2006
58. Y. Shahar, S. Miksch, P. Johnson, A task-specific ontology for the application and critiquing of time oriented clinical guidelines, in Proc. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe (1997), 51-61.
59. A. Advani, K. Lo, Y. Shahar, Intention-based critiquing of guideline-oriented medical care, in Proc. American Medical Informatics Annual Symposium (1998), 483-487.
60. A. Advani, Y. Shahar, M.A. Musen., Medical quality assessment by scoring adherence to guideline intentions, JAMIA 9 (2002), S9-S97.
61. M. Peleg, S. Tu, Comparing models of decision and action for guideline-based decision support: a case-study approach, Stanford University, 2002, Report No.: SMI-2002-0922.
62. W. Aigner, S. Miksch, CareVis: Integrated visualization of computerized protocols and temporal patient data., in Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology, 2004.
63. R. Kosara, S. Miksch, H. Hauser, Focus and context taken literally, IEEE Computer Graphics and its Applications 22(1) (2002), 22-29.
64. K. Bradbrook, G. Winstanley, D. Glasspool, J. Fox, R. Griffiths, AI Planning Technology as a Component of Computerised Clinical Practice Guidelines, AIME 2005, LNAI 3581 (2005), 171-180.