![]() |
Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 185-189
|
Sandblasted/acid-etched vs smooth-surface implants: implant clinical reaction to experimentally induced peri-implantitis in Beagle dogs.
a
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
BONE REGENERATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL ETCHING;
DENTAL SURGERY;
DENTURE;
DOG;
MANDIBLE;
METHODOLOGY;
PERIODONTAL DISEASE;
PERIODONTITIS;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PREMOLAR TOOTH;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TIME;
TOOTH IMPLANTATION;
TOOTH PROSTHESIS;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
ANIMALS;
BICUSPID;
DENTAL ABUTMENTS;
DENTAL ETCHING;
DENTAL IMPLANTS;
DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED;
DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE;
DOGS;
MANDIBLE;
OSSEOINTEGRATION;
PERIODONTAL ATTACHMENT LOSS;
PERIODONTAL POCKET;
PERIODONTITIS;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 56149096436
PISSN: 01606972
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1563/0.880.1 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (13)
|
References (0)
|