Application of evolutionary programming techniques in geotechnical engineering

Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering - Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 677-682

  Rezania, M ^a   Javadi, A A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

COMPLEX PROBLEMS; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; EVOLUTIONARY POLYNOMIAL REGRESSIONS; EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES; NONLINEAR INTERACTIONS; NUMBER OF FACTORS; PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 56149086346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/9781439833766.ch98     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Abu-Kiefa, M.A. 1998. General regression neural networks for driven piles in cohesionless soils. J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Engrg. 124(12): 1177-1185.
2. Baziar, M.H. & Nilipour, N. 2003. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neural-networks and CPT results. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engng. 23: 631-636.
3. Benardos, A.G. & Kaliampakos, D.C. 2004. Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks. J. Tunnelling & Underground Space Tech. 19(6): 597-605.
4. Chan, W.T. Chow, Y.K. & Liu, L.F. 1995. Neural network: An alternative to pile driving formulas. J. Computers & Geotechnics, 17: 135-156.
5. Flood, I. & Kartam, N. 1994. Neural networks in civil engineering II principles and understanding. J. Computing in Civil Engrg., 8(2): 149-162.
6. Giustolisi, O. 2002. Some techniques to avoid overfitting of artificial neural networks. Hydroinfiormatics; Proc. 5th intern. conf., Cardiff, 1-5 July 2002. London: IWA publishing, 2: 1465-1477.
7. Giustolisi, O. & Savic, D.A. 2006. A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression. J. Hydroinfiormatics 8(3): (in press).
8. Goh, A.T.C. 1994. Nonlinear modelling in geotechnical engineering using neural networks. Australian Civil Engrg. Trans. 36(4): 293-297.
9. Goh, A.T.C. 1995a. Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems. Artificial Intelligence in Engrg. 9: 143-151.
10. Goh, A.T.C. 1995b. Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks. Geotechnique 45(4): 709-714.
11. Goh, A.T.C. 1996. Pile driving records reanalyzed using neural networks. J. Geotech. Engrg. 122(6): 492-495.
12. Jaksa, M.B. 1995. The influence of spatial variability on the geotechncial design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay. PhD thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
13. Juang, C.H. & Chen, C.J. 1999. CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engng. 14: 221-229.
14. Juang, C.H., Jiang, T. & Christopher, R.A. 2001. Three-dimensional site characterisation: neural network approach. Geotechnique 51(9): 799-809.
15. Lee, I.M. & Lee, J.H. 1996. Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks. Computers & Geotechnics 18(3): 189-200.
16. Lippmann, R.P. 1987. An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing Magazine 4(2): 4-22.
17. Lu, P. & Rosenbaum, M.S. 2003. Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability. Natural Hazards 30(3): 383-395.
18. Schmertmann, J.H., Hartman, J.P. & Brown, P.B. 1978. Improved strain influence factor diagrams. J. Geotech. Engrg. Div. 104(8): 1131-1135.
19. Schultze, E. & Sherif, G. 1973. Prediction of settlements from evaluated settlement observations for sand. Soil Mech. & Foundation Engrg.; Proc. 8th intern. conf., Moscow, 1(3): 225-230.
20. Shahin, M.A. Jaksa, M.B. & Maier, H.R. 2002a. Artificial neural network-based settlement prediction formula for shallow foundations on granular soils. Australian Geomechanics 37(4): 45-52.
21. Shahin, M.A. Jaksa, M.B. & Maier, H.R. 2005. Neural network based stochastic design charts for settlement prediction. Canadian Geotech. J. 42(1): 110-120.
22. Shahin, M.A. Maier, H.R. & Jaksa, M.B. 2002b. Predicting settlements of shallow foundations using artificial neural networks. J. Geotech. Geoenv. Engrg. 128(9): 785-793.
23. Shahin, M.A. Maier, H.R. & Jaksa, M.B. 2003a. Neural and neurofuzzy techniques applied to modelling settlement of shallow foundations on granular soils. In D.A. Post (ed.), Modeling and simulation, MODSIM; Proc. intern. congress, Townsville, Queensland, 4: 1886-1891.
24. Shahin, M.A. Maier, H.R. & Jaksa, M.B. 2003b. Settlement prediction of shallow foundations on granular soils using B-spline neurofuzzy models. Computers & Geotechnics 30(8): 637-647.
25. Sivakugan, N. Eckersley, J.D. & Li, H. 1998. Settlement predictions using neural networks. Australian Civil Engrg. Trans., 40: 49-52.
26. Teh, C.I. Wong, K.S. Goh, A.T.C. & Jaritngam, S. 1997. Prediction of pile capacity using neural networks. J. Computing in Civil Engrg. 11(2): 129-138.
27. Zhu, J.H. Zaman, M.M. & Anderson, S.A. 1998a. Modeling of soil behavior with a recurrent neural network. Canadian Geotech. J. 35(5): 858-872.