Organizational risk dynamics in complex goal environments

Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2007, ESREL 2007 - Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 1399-1406

  Marais, Karen ^a   Saleh, Joseph H ^b   Leveson, Nancy G ^c  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE;

COMPLEX SYSTEMS; COURSES OF ACTIONS; LONG TERMS; ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS; ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS; POTENTIAL OUTCOMES; RESOURCE PRESSURES; RISK DYNAMICS; ROBUST STRATEGIES; SAFETY GOALS;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 56149085273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Amalberti, R. 2001. The Paradoxes of Almost Totally Safe Transportation Systems. Safety Science, 37:109-126.
2. Carroll, John S. 1998. Safety culture as an ongoing process: culture surveys as opportunities for enquiry and change. Work and Stress, 12(3):272-284.
3. Cooper, M.D., 2000. Towards a Model of Safety Culture. Safety Science, 36(2): 111-136.
4. French, S., Bedford T. Atherton. E. 2003. Supporting ALARP decision-making by Cost-Benefit Analysis and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. Strathclyde Business School Research Paper. Available online at http://www.managementscience.org/research/ab0115.asp. Accessed May 2006.
5. Gehman, H.W. 2003. Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report Volume 1, NASA and GAO, August 2003
6. Hämäläinen R.P., Lindstedt. M., Sinkko. K. 2000. Multi-Attribute Risk Analysis in Nuclear Emergency Management. Risk Analysis. 20(4):455-468.
7. Lee, T. & Harrison, K. 2000. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Safety Science. 34(1):61-97.
8. Merkhofer, M. W. & Keeney, R. L. 1987. A Multi-Attribute Analysis of Alternative Sites for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste. Risk Analysis. 7(2):173-194.
9. IAEA 1986. IAEA Summary Report on the Post-Accident Review Meeting on the Chernobyl Accident. INSAG-1. p. 76.
10. IAEA 1992. The IAEA's International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (INSAG), The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1 (INSAG-7). p. 24.
11. Kemeny, J.G. 1979, Report of The President's Commission on The Accident at Three Mile Island, October, 1979.
12. Leveson, N.G. 1995, Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
13. Marais, K., Saleh, J.H., Leveson, N.G. 2006. Archetypes for Organisational Safety. Safety Science. 44(7):565-582.
14. Parnell, G., Conley, H., Jackson, J., Lehmkuhl, L, and Andrew, J. 1998. Foundations 2025: A Framework for Evaluating Future Air and Space Forces. Management Science 44(10) 1336-1350.
15. Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16. Pidgeon, N.F. 1998. Safety culture: key theoretical issues. Work & Stress, 12(3):202-216.
17. Rasmussen, Jens 1997. Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem. Safety Science. 27(2/3): 183-213.
18. Shrivastava, P. 1992. Bhopal: anatomy of a crisis, 2nd ed. London: P. Chapman.
19. Sorensen, J.N. 2002. Safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76: 189-204.
20. Wiegmann D.A., Zhang H., von Thaden T.L., Sharma G.J., Gibbons A.M. 2004. Safety culture: An integrative review. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14(2): 117-134.
21. Woods, D.D. & Cook, R.I. 1999. Perspectives on Human Error: Hindsight Biases and Local Rationality. In F.T. Durso (ed), Handbook of Applied Cognition: 141-171. New York: Wiley.