ProICET: A cost-sensitive system for prostate cancer data

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 297-307

  Vidrighin, Camelia ^a   Potolea, Rodica ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ NAPOCA   (Romania)

Author keywords

Cost sensitive learning; Data mining; Hybrid algorithm; Implementation; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PROSTATE CANCER;

EID: 56049113949     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458208096558     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/stt/stt_0.asp/, March 2007.
2. Dursun H., Nainish P. Knowledge extraction from prostate cancer data. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006.
3. Turney P. Types of cost in inductive concept learning. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learning, 7th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2000.
4. Turney P. Cost sensitive classification: Empirical evaluation of a hybrid genetic decision tree induction algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1995; (2); 369-409.
5. Freund Y., Schapire R. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 1997; 55(1); 119-39.
6. Fan W., Stolfo S., Zhang J., Chan P. Adacost: Misclassification cost-sensitive boosting. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2000, pp. 97-105.
7. Domingos P. Metacost: A general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1991.
8. Li J., Li X., Yao X. Cost-sensitive classification with genetic programming. In Proceedings of the 2005 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, volume 3, 2114-21.
9. Sheng S., Ling C. Hybrid cost-sensitive decision tree. PKDD 2005; 274-84.
10. Sheng S., Ling C., Yang Q. Simple test strategies for cost-sensitive decision trees. ECML 2005; 365-76.
11. Quinlan J. C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
12. Witten I., Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
13. General Genetic Algorithm Tool, GGAT. http://www.karnig.co.uk/ga/ ggat.html, July 2008.
14. Vidrighin C., Savin C., Potolea R. A hybrid algorithm for medical diagnosis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 8 Eurocon 2007 Conference, September 2007, Warsaw, pp. 668-73.
15. Onaci A., Vidrighin C., Cuibus M., Potolea R. Enhancing classifiers through neural network ensembles. In Proceedings of the 3rd ICCP 2007, 6-8 September, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, pp. 57-64.
16. Moldovan T., Vidrighin C., Giurgiu I., Potolea R. Evidence combination for baseline accuracy determination. In Proceedings of the 3rd ICCP 2007, 6-8 September, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, pp. 41-8.
17. Vidrighin C., Muresan T., Potolea R. Improving classification performance on real data through imputation. In Proceedings of AQTR 2008, 22-25 May, Cluj-Napoca, pp. 464-70.
18. Vidrighin C., Potolea R. Towards a combined approach for feature selection. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, ICSOFT 2008, 5-8 July, Porto, Portugal, volume ISDM/ABF, pp. 134-40.