Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing: The influence of serotype, type of adjuvant, valency, fractionation method, and virus culture on the dose-response curve in cattle

Vaccine

Volumn 26, Issue 50, 2008, Pages 6317-6321

  Jamal, Syed M ^a,b   Bouma, Annemarie ^a   van den Broek, Jan ^a   Stegeman, Arjan ^a   Chénard, Gilles ^c   Dekker, Aldo ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b National Veterinary Laboratory   (Pakistan)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Challenge test; Dose response curve; Foot and mouth disease; Potency; Vaccine

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE; SAPONIN;

ARTICLE; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG POTENCY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEROTYPE; VIRUS CULTURE;

ADJUVANTS, IMMUNOLOGIC; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, IMMUNOLOGIC; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; SEROTYPING; VIRAL VACCINES; VIRUS CULTIVATION;

EID: 56049111599     PISSN: 0264410X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Goris N., Merkelbach-Peters P., Diev V.I., Verloo D., Zakharov V.M., Kraft H.P., et al. European Pharmacopoeia foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing in cattle: between test variability and its consequences. Vaccine 25 17 (2007) 3373-3379
2. Anonymous. Foot-and-mouth disease (ruminants) vaccine (inactivated). European Pharmacopoeia 2008;60.
3. Barnett P.V., Statham R.J., Vosloo W., and Haydon D.T. Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing: determination and statistical validation of a model using a serological approach. Vaccine 21 23 (2003) 3240-3248
4. Pay T.W., and Hingley P.J. A potency test method for foot and mouth disease vaccine based on the serum neutralizing antibody response produced in cattle. Vaccine 10 10 (1992) 707-713
5. Pay T.W., and Hingley P.J. Correlation of 140S antigen dose with the serum neutralizing antibody response and the level of protection induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Vaccine 5 1 (1987) 60-64
6. Pay T.W.F., and Hingley P.J. Foot and mouth disease vaccine potency tests in cattle: the interrelationship of antigen dose, serum neutralizing antibody response and protection from challenge. Vaccine 10 10 (1992) 699-706
7. Robiolo B., Grigera P.R., Periolo O.H., Seki C., Bianchi T., Maradei E., et al. Assessment of foot and mouth disease vaccine potency by liquid-phase blocking ELISA: a proposal for an alternative to the challenge procedure in Argentina. Vaccine 13 14 (1995) 1346-1352
8. van Maanen C., and Terpstra C. Comparison of a liquid-phase blocking sandwich ELISA and a serum neutralization test to evaluate immunity in potency tests of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. J Immunol Methods 124 (1989) 111-119
9. Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC. 2003/85/EC, 2003.
10. Frenkel H.S. Research on foot-and-mouth disease. III. The cultivation of the virus on a practical scale in explantations of bovine tongue epithelium. Am J Vet Res 12 44 (1951) 187-190
11. Frenkel H.S. La culture du virus de la fièvre aphteuse sur l'épithelium de la langue des bovidés. Bull Off Int Epizoot 28 (1947) 155-162
12. Capstick P.B., Telling R.C., Chapman W.G., and Stewart D.L. Growth of a cloned strain of hamster kidney cells in suspended cultures and their susceptibility to the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 195 (1962) 1163-1164
13. Telling R.C., and Elsworth R. Submerged culture of hamster kidney cells in a stainless steel vessel. Biotechnol Bioeng 1 11 (1965) 417-434
14. Stellmann C., Terré J., Favre H., Brun A., and Fontaine J. Comparison of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing on cattle in terms of the nature of the diluent. Arch Virol 54 (1977) 61-74
15. Vianna Filho Y.L., Astudillo V., Gomes I., Fernandez G., Rozas C.E.E., Ravison J.A., et al. Potency control of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle - comparison of the 50% protective dose and the protection against generalization. Vaccine 11 14 (1994) 1424-1428
16. Pay T.W.F., and Hingley P.J. Correlation of 140S antigen dose with the serum neutralizing antibody response and the level of protection induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Vaccine 5 1 (1987) 60-64