A meaningful, but not completely convincing questionnaire for acupuncture research;Ein sinnvolles, aber nicht vollständig überzeugendes neues instrument in der akupunkturforschung

Forschende Komplementarmedizin

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 290-291

  Pach, Daniel ^a,b  

^a Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin ^*

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUPUNCTURE; CONSULTATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; GENERAL HOSPITAL; INTERVIEW; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NEEDLE SENSATION; NOTE; PAIN; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRIVATE PRACTICE; SENSATION; SOUTHAMPTON NEEDLE SENSATION QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACUPUNCTURE; HUMANS; PAIN; PLACEBO EFFECT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56049109751     PISSN: 16614119     EISSN: 16614127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000158575     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Kong J, Gollub R, Huang T, Polich G, Napadow V, Hui K, Vangel M, Rosen B, Kaptchuk TJ: Acupuncture de qi, from qualitative history to quantitative measurement. J Altern Complement Med 2007;13(10):1059-1070.
2. Hui KK, Nixon EE, Vangel MG, Liu J, Marina O, Napadow V, Hodge SM, Rosen BR, Makris N, Kennedy DN: Characterization of the 'deqi' response in acupuncture. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007;7:33.
3. Litscher G: Bioengineering assessment of acupuncture, part 5: cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2006;34(6):439-457.
4. Litscher G: Bioengineering assessment of acupuncture, part 4: functional magnetic resonance imaging. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2006;34(4):327-345.