Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters

Biometrics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1270-1275

  Agresti, Alan ^a   Bini, Matilde ^b   Bertaccini, Bruno ^b   Ryu, Euijung ^c  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bonferroni method; Difference of proportions; Odds ratio; Score test; Studentized range distribution; Tukey multiple comparisons

Indexed keywords

RISK ASSESSMENT;

BINOMIAL SAMPLES; BONFERRONI METHOD; DIFFERENCE OF PROPORTION; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; ODD RATIOS; RANGE DISTRIBUTION; SCORE TEST; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; STUDENTIZED RANGE DISTRIBUTION; TUKEY MULTIPLE COMPARISON;

BIOMETRICS;

REMACEMIDE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TESTING METHOD;

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY SAMPLE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 56049098181     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00990.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agresti, A. (1999). On logit confidence intervals for the odds ratio with small samples. Biometrics 55, 597 602.
2. Agresti, A. and Caffo, B. (2000). Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and difference of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures. The American Statistician 54, 280 288.
3. Agresti, A. and Min, Y. (2005). Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrics 61, 515 523.
4. Beal, S. L. (1987). Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference between two binomial parameters for use with small samples. Biometrics 43, 941 950.
5. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2005). False discovery rate - adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 71 81.
6. Bera, A. K. and Bilias, Y. (2001). Rao's score, Neyman's C (α) and Silvey's LM tests: An essay on historical developments and some new results. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 97, 9 44.
7. Cornfield, J. (1956). A statistical problem arising from retrospective studies. Proceedings of the 3rd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, J. Neyman (ed. 4, 135 148.
8. Hirji, K. (2005). Exact Analysis of Discrete Data. Boca Raton, Florida : Chapman & Hall.
9. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York : John Wiley.
10. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65 70.
11. Kieburtz, K. and Huntington Study Group (2001). A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 and remacemide in Huntington's disease. Neurology 57, 397 404.
12. Koopman, P. A. R. (1984). Confidence intervals for the ratio of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 40, 513 517.
13. 2 statistics in generalized linear models. Statistical Papers 46, 555 574.
14. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63, 655 660.
15. McCann, M. H. and Tebbs, J. M. (2007). Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137, 1278 1290.
16. Mee, R. W. (1984). Confidence bounds for the difference between two probabilities (letter). Biometrics 40, 1175 1176.
17. Miettinen, O. and Nurminen, M. (1985). Comparative analysis of two rates. Statistics in Medicine 4, 213 226.
18. Newcombe, R. G. (1998). Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 873 890.
19. Piegorsch, W. W. (1991). Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response. Biometrics 47, 45 52.
20. Rom, D. M., Costello, R. J., and Connell, L. T. (1994). On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis. Statistics in Medicine 13, 1583 1596.