Single-center prospective, randomized analysis of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 619-625

  Markovic, D M ^a   Davidovic, L B ^a   Cvetkovic, D D ^a   Maksimovic, Z V ^a   Markovic, D Z ^a   Jadranin, D B ^a  

^a CLINICAL CENTER OF SERBIA   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Carotid arteries; Endarterectomy, carotid; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVERSION CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SUTURE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAROTID STENOSIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56049092576     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). Investigators: clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1991;22:816-7.
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialist's Colaborative Group. MRC European carotid surgery trial, interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-90%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43.
3. Entz L, Jaranyi Z, Nemes A. Comparison of perioperative results obtained with carotid eversion endarterectomy and with conventional patch plasty. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:16-20.
4. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Caporali S, Leuti M, Ricci S et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: A prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14:96-104.
5. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zanneti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G et al. A randomized study on eversion verus standard carotid endarteretomy: study design and preliminary results: The EVEREST Trial. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:595-605.
6. Kazanchian PO, Popov VA, Rudakova TV, Gaporova EN. Eversion carotid endarterectomy: advantages and disadvantages. Vestn Khir Im IL Grek 1998;157:11-6.
7. Ballotta E, Da Giau G, Saladini M, Abbruzzese E, Renon L, Toniato A. Carotid endarterectomy with patch closure versus carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation: A prospective randomized study. Surgery 1999;125:271-9.
8. Peiper C, Nowack J, Ktenidis K, Reifenhauser W, Keresztury G, Horsch S. Eversion endarterectomy versus open thromboendarterectomy and patch plasty for the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:339-43.
9. Radak ?, Radeviç B, Sternic N, Vuãureviç G, Petroviç B, Ilijevski N et al.Single center experiece on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: A prospective - non randomized study. Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8:422-8.
10. Katras T, Baltazar U, Rush DS, Sutterfield WC, Harvill LM, Straton PE Jr. Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:453-8.
11. Darling RC 3rd, Paty PS, Shah DM, Chang BB, Leather RP. Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: technique and results in 449 procedures. Surgery1996, 120(4):635-9.
12. Shah DM, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, Paty PSK, Kreinberg PB, Lloyd WE et al. Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability. Ann Surg 1998;228:471-8.
13. Cao PG, De Rango P, Zannetti S. Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systemic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;23:195-201.
14. Littoy FN, Gagovic V, Sandu C, Mansour A, Kang S, Greisler HP. Comparison of standard carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch angioplasty versus eversion carotid endarterectomy during 4-year period. Am Surg 2004;70:181-5.
15. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2000;31(1Pt1):19-30.
16. Kieny R, Hirsch D, Seiller C, Thiarnos JC, Petiti H. Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis? Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:53-60.
17. Balzer K, Guds I, Heger J, Jahnel B. Conventional thrombendarteectomy with carotid patch plasty vs eversion endarterectomy: technique, indications and results. Zentralbl Chir 2000;125:228-38.
18. Green RM, Greenberg R, Illig K, Shrotell C, Ouriel K. Eversion endarterectomy of the carotid artery: technical considerations and recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:1052-6.
19. Ballotta E, DaGian G, Piccoli A, Baracchini C. Durability of carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic stenosis. J Vasc Surg 204;40:270-8.
20. Bartolucci R, D? Andrea V, Leo E, De Antoni E. Cranial and neck nerve injuries following carotid endareterectomy interventions: Review of the literature. Chir Ital 2001;53:73-80.
21. Zannetti S, Parente B, De Rango P, Giordano G, Serafini G, Rosseti M et al. Role of surgical techniques and operative findings in cranial and cervical nerve injuries during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;15:528-31.
22. Assadian A, Senekowitsch C, Pfaffelmeyer N, Assadian O, Ptakovsky H, Hagmüller GW. Incidence of cranial nerve injuries after carotid eversion endarterectomy with a transverse skin incision under regional anesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:421-4.