Effectiveness of proactive Quitline service and predictors of successful smoking cessation: Findings from a preliminary study of Quitline service for smoking cessation in Korea

Journal of Korean Medical Science

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 888-894

  Myung, Seung Kwon ^a   Park, Jae Gahb ^b   Woo, Kyung Bae ^c   Yeon, Ji Lee ^a   Kim, Yeol ^a   Hong, Gwan Seo ^a  

^a National Cancer Center   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Abstinence; Counseling; Predictor; Telephone; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; KOREA; LIFESTYLE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOTLINES; HUMANS; KOREA; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56049091076     PISSN: 10118934     EISSN: 15986357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.5.888     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Owen L. Impact of a telephone helpline for smokers who called during a mass media campaign. Tob Control 2000; 9: 148-54.
2. Platt S, Tannahill A, Watson J, Fraser E. Effectiveness of antismoking telephone helpline: follow up survey. BMJ 1997; 314: 1371-5.
3. Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, Rosbrook B, Johnson CE, Byrd M, Gutierrez-Terrell E. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1087-93.
4. An LC, Zhu SH, Nelson DB, Arikian NJ, Nugent S, Partin MR, Joseph AM. Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 536-42.
5. Stead LF, Perera R, Lancaster T. Telephone counseling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3: CD002850.
6. Pan W. Proactive telephone counseling as an adjunct to minimal intervention to for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 416-27.
7. Jaen CR, Cummings KM, Zielezny M, O'Shea R. Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation among users of a telephone hotline. Public Health Rep 1993; 108: 772-8.
8. Balanda KP, Lowe JB, O'Connor-Fleming ML. Comparison of two self-help smoking cessation booklets. Tob Control 1999; 8: 57-61.
9. Abdullah AS, Lam TH, Chan SS, Hedley AJ. Which smokers use the smoking cessation Quitline in Hong Kong, and how effective is the Quitline? Tob Control 2004; 13: 415-21.
10. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Snow MG. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull 1992; 111: 23-41.
11. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2002; 4: 149-59.
12. Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Using tailored interventions to enhance smoking cessation among African-Americans at a community health center. Nicotine Tob Res 1999; 1: 77-85.
13. Miller CL, Wakefield M, Roberts L. Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian telephone Quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign. Tob Control 2003; 12 (Suppl 2): ii53-8.
14. International Telecommunication Union. ITU ICT Eye: ICT Statistics 2006. Available at: www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/DisplayCountry.aspx?code=KOR.
15. Glasgow RE, Mullooly JP, Vogt TM, Stevens VJ, Lichtenstein E, Hollis JF, Lando HA, Severson HH, Pearson KA, Vogt MR. Biochemical validation of smoking status: pros, cons, and data from four low-intensity intervention trials. Addict Behav 1993; 18: 511-27.
16. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking; a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1086-93.