Review on responses of plant phenology to simulated elevated CO2 concentration and temperature

Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 716-720

  Xu, Zhenfeng ^a   Hu, Tingxing ^a   Zhang, Yuanbin ^b   Wang, Kaiyun ^b,c   Xian, Junren ^b  

^a SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^c EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Elevated carbon dioxide concentration; Increased temperature; Phenology; Plant; Response

Indexed keywords

EID: 55949137995     PISSN: 1006687X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2008.00716     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Chinese source
2. Oreskes N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 2004, 306: 1686
3. IPCC. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. The Third Assessment Report of Working Group. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 2001
4. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical science basis. The Fourth Assessment Report of Working Group. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 2007
5. Snyder L, Spano D, Duce P. Temperature data for phenological models. Int J Biometeorol, 2001, 45 (4): 178-183
6. Ge QS, Zheng JY, Zhang XX. Study of Chinese climate and phenology change in past 40 years. Progr Nat Sci, 2003, 13 (10): 1048-1053
7. Fang XQ, Yu WH. Progress in the studies on the phenological responses to global warming. Adv Earth Sci, 2002, 17 (5): 714-919
8. Schwartz MD, Crawford TM. Detecting energy balance modifications at the onset of spring. Phys Geogr, 2001, 22: 394-409
9. Kmmer K, Leinonen L, Loustau D. The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems an overview. Int J Biometeorol, 2000, 44 (2): 67-75
10. Zhen JY, Ge QS, Hao ZX. Impacts of global warming on plant phenophase in China for the last 40 years. Chin Sci Bull, 2002, 47 (20): 1582-1587
11. Zhang FC. Effects of global warming on plant phenological events in china. Acta Ecograph Sin, 1995, 50 (5): 402-410
12. 2 measurements. Nature, 1996, 382: 146-149
13. Meazel A. Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1959 and 1996. Int J Biometeorol, 2000, 44 (2): 76-81
14. Meazel A. Plant phenological anomalies in Germany and their relation to air temperature and NAO. Climatic Chang, 2003, 57: 243-263
15. Chmielewski FM, Rölzer T. Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2001, 108 (2): 101-112
16. Li RP, Zhou GS, Zhang HL. Research advance in plant ecology. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17 (3): 541-544
17. Lu PL, Yu Q, He QT. Responses of plant phenology to climate change. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26 (3): 923-929
18. Xu YQ, Lu PL, Yu Q. Review and prospect in the researches of influence of climate change on plant phenology. Resourc Sci, 2004, 26 (1): 129-136
19. Zhang XX, Ge QS, Zhen. Overview on the vegetation phenology using the remote sensing. Adv Earth Sci, 2003, 18 (4): 534-544
20. Chinese source
21. William MJ, Ramakrishna N, Steven WR.A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar phenology in response to climate.Glob Chang Biol, 2005, 11: 619-632
22. Zhang L, Luo TX. Advances in ecological studies on leaf lifespan and associated leaf traits. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2004, 28 (6): 844-852
23. 2 enrichment. Glob Chang Biol, 2003, 9 (12): 1792-1801
24. 2 world. Plant Cell Environ, 1991, 14: 13-20
25. Mendelsohn R, Rosenberg NJ. Framework for integrated assessments of global warming impacts. Climate Chang, 1994, 28: 15-44
26. 2] and increased temperature on growth of plants. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2002, 8 (3): 319-324
27. Stanton ML, Rejmanek M, Galen C. Changes in vegetation and soil fertility along a predictable snowmelt gradient in the Mosquito Range. Colorado, USA. Arct Alp Res, 1994, 26: 364-374
28. 2] and nutrient status modified leaf phenology and growth rhythm of young Populus trichocarpa trees in a 3-year field study. Trees, 2001, 15: 403-413
29. 2 enrichment and nutrient availability in Norway spruce on phenology and morphology of branches. Trees-Struct Funct, 1999, 13: 188-198
30. 2 concentration on the phenology and growth of Leymus chinensis. Environ Sci, 1999, 9: 25-29
31. 2 and light interactions for leaf phenology, growth and senescence in Quercus rubra. Glob Chang Biol, 2000, 6 (8): 877-887
32. Loarie SR, Mooney HA, Field CB. Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. PNAS, 2006, 103 (37): 13740-13744
33. 2 on flowering phenology and nectar production of nectar plants important for butterflies of calcareous grasslands. Oecologia, 1998, 13 (3): 341-349
34. 2 springs on Nardus stricta: photosynthesis, biochemistry, growth and phenology. Plant Cell Environ, 1998, 21: 417-425
35. 2 on species phenology, growth and reproduction in a Mediterranean old-field community. Glob Chang Biol, 1997, 3 (8): 523-530
36. 2 on phenology, growth and crown structure of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings after two years of exposure in the field. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19: 289-300
37. 2, nutrition and climatic warming on bud phenology in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and their impact on the risk of frost damage. Tree Physiol, 1994, 14: 691-706
38. 2 and (or)temperature. Can J Bot, 1998, 76: 1991-2001
39. 2: No loss of photosynthetic enhancement. Plant Cell Environ, 1993, 16: 797-807
40. Curtis PS. Seasonal responses of leaf gas exchange to elevated carbon dioxide in Populus grandidentata. Can J For Res, 1992, 22: 1320-1325
41. Chapin FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF. Arctic plant physiological ecology in an ecosystem context. In: Chapin FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF. Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: an Ecophysiological Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press. 1992. 441-452
42. Grabherr G, Gottfried M, Pauli H. Climate effects of mountain plants. Nature, 1994, 369: 448-450
43. Zhou HK, Zhou XM, Zhao XQ. A preliminary study of the influence of simulated greenhouse effect on a Kobresia humilis meadow. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2000, 24 (5): 547-553
44. Suzuki S, Kudo G. Responses of alpine shrubs to simulated environmental change during three years in the mid-latitude mountain, northern Japan Ecography, 2000, 23: 553-564
45. Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman W. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol, 1997, 3 (Suppl.1): 20-32
46. Molau U, Molgaardp. ITEX Manual, 2rd ed Copenhagen: Danish Polar Center, 1996
47. Henry GHR, Molau U. Tundra plants and climate change: The International Tundra Experiment (ITEX). Glob Chang Biol, 1997, 3: 1-9
48. Dunne JA, Harte J, Taylor KJ. Subalpine meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change integrating experimental and gradient methods. Ecol Monogr, 2002, 73 (1): 69-86
49. Suzuki S, Kudo G. Short-term effects of simulated environmental change on phenology, leaf traits, and shoot growth of alpine plants on a temperate mountain, northern Japan. Glob change Biol, 1997, 3 (Suppl.1): 108-115
50. Billings WD. Phytogeographic and evolutionary potential of the arctic flora and vegetation in a changing climate. In: Chapin FS III, Jeffries RL, Reynolds JE. Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. San Diego California: Academic Press, 1992, 91-109
51. Chapin FS III, Bret-Harte MS, Hobbie SE. Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation of global change. J Veg Sci, 1996, 7: 347-356
52. Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, Hollister RD, Laine K, Levesque E, Marion G.M, Molgaard P, Raszhivin V, Robiuson CH, Starr G, Totoland Q, Welker JM, Wookey PM. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta-analysis of the International Tundra Experiment. Ecol Monogr, 1999, 69: 491-511
53. 2 and temperature under boreal conditions. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38: 69-81
54. 2 on the frost handiness of Scots pine. Plant Cell Environ, 1996, 19: 209-216
55. Harrington RM, Woidwod L, Sparks T. Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends Eeol Evol, 1999, 14 (4): 146-150