An alternative pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic displacement demands

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3793-3807

  Kim, Sun Pil ^a   Kurama, Yahya C ^b  

^a Hyundai Development Institute of Construction Technology   (South Korea)

^b University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

Modal pushover analysis; Seismic design and analysis; Seismic displacement demands

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC; DOMES; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; FLOORS; ROOFS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY;

BUILDING FRAMES; BUILDING STRUCTURES; GROUND MOTIONS; HIGHER MODES; HISTORY ANALYSIS; LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS; LATERAL FORCES; MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKES; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSES; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; MOMENT RESISTING; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NONLINEAR RANGES; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS; SEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS; SEISMIC MASSES;

MODAL ANALYSIS;

BUILDING; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL METHOD; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC METHOD;

EID: 55949137594     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE Standard No. ASCE/SEI 41-06. 2007
2. Antoniou S., and Pinho R. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8 5 (2004) 643-661
3. Papanikolaou V.K., Elnashai A.S., and Pareja J.F. Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: Comparative results. J Earthq Eng 10 1 (2006) 127-151
4. Chopra AK, Goel R. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: Summary and evaluation. In: Fifth national conference on earthquake engineering; 2003
5. Chopra A.K., and Goel R. Role of higher-mode pushover analyses in seismic analysis of buildings. Earthq Spectra 21 4 (2005) 1027-1041
6. Chopra A.K., and Goel R. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31 3 (2002) 561-582
7. Chopra A.K., and Goel R. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33 8 (2004) 903-927
8. Chopra AK, Goel R. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report no. PEER-1999/02. Berkeley (CA): Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1999
9. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering (2001), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
10. Nassar A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report No. 95. Stanford (CA): The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University; 1991
11. Ohtori Y., Christenson R.E., Spencer Jr. B.F., and Dyke S.J. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. J Eng Mech 130 4 (2004) 366-385
12. International conference of building officials. Structural engineering design provisions. Uniform building code, vol. 2. 1994
13. OpenSees Development Team (Open Source Project), OpenSees: Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley (CA): Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1998-2002. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/
14. Mahin S, Bertero V. An evaluation of some methods for predicting the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings. UCB/EERC-75-5. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1975
15. Hachem M. BISPEC user manual. Berkeley (CA): University of California; 1999. www.ce.berkeley.edu/~hachem/bispec
16. International Code Council (ICC). International building code. Falls Church (VA). 2003
17. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. report SAC/BD-97/04. Prepared for the SAC Joint Venture. Sacramento (CA): Structural Engineers Association of California; 1997
18. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Parts 1 and 2, FEMA-302 and FEMA-303. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); 1998
19. Frankel A, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker E, Dickman N. et al. National seismic hazard maps, June 1996: Documentation. US Geological Survey. Open-File report 96-532; 1996
20. Kurama Y., and Farrow K. Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32 15 (2003) 2425-2450