Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: General approach

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3644-3653

  Frangopol, Dan M ^a   Strauss, Alfred ^a   Kim, Sunyong ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance sampling considerations; Monitored extreme data; Monitoring programs; Performance assessment; Prediction functions; Reliability profiles; Structural degradation

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; DEGRADATION; FORECASTING; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING CONSIDERATIONS; MONITORED EXTREME DATA; MONITORING PROGRAMS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION FUNCTIONS; RELIABILITY PROFILES; STRUCTURAL DEGRADATION;

MODELS;

BRIDGE; LOADING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 55949121005     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AASHTO. AASHTO Standard specification for highway bridges. 17th Ed. (2002), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington (DC)
2. American Railway Engineering Association, AREA. Manual for railway engineering, steel structures (1994), AREA [chapter 15]
3. Ang A.H.-S., and Tang W.H. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design Vol. I (1975), John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Bazant Z.P., and Kim J.K. Segmental box girder: Deflection probability and Bayesian updating. J Struct Eng, ASCE 115 10 (1990) 2528-2547
5. Biondini F., Bontempi F., Frangopol D.M., and Malerba P.G. Cellular automata approach to durability analysis of concrete structures in aggressive environments. J Struct Eng, ASCE 130 (2004) 1724-1735
6. Ellingwood B.R., and Zheng R. Role of non-destructive evaluation in time-dependent reliability analysis. Struct Safety 20 4 (1998) 325-339
7. Enright M.P., and Frangopol D.M. Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating. J Struct Eng, ASCE 125 10 (1999) 1118-1125
8. Estes A.C., and Frangopol D.M. RELSYS: A computer program for structural system reliability analysis. Struct Eng Mech, Techno-Press 6 8 (1998) 901-919
9. Estes A.C., and Frangopol D.M. Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach. J Struct Eng, ASCE 125 7 (1999) 766-775
10. Frangopol D.M., and Estes A.C. Bridge maintenance strategies based on system reliability. Struct Eng Internat J IABSE 7 3 (1997) 193-198
11. Frangopol D.M., Kong J.S., and Gharaibeh E.S. Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. J Comp Civ Engrg, ASCE 15 1 (2001) 27-34
12. Frangopol D.M., and Liu M. Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Struct Infrastructure Eng 3 1 (2007) 29-41
13. Frangopol D.M., Strauss A., and Kim S. Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring. J Bridge Engrg, ASCE 13 3 (2008) 258-270
14. Hodgson I.. Personal discussion for the acquisition of the real data from the monitoring of the I-39 Northbound Bridge over the Wisconsin River. Ian Hodgson, Senior Research Engineer. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. ATLSS Center. Lehigh Univ. 117 ATLSS Dr. Bethlehem. PA 18015-4729, personal contact on February 12, 2007; 2007
15. Kong J.S., and Frangopol D.M. Cost-reliability interaction in life-cycle cost optimization of deteriorating structures. J Struct Engrg, ASCE 130 11 (2004) 1704-1712
16. Levine D.M., Ramsey P.P., and Smidt R.K. Applied statistics for engineers and scientists (2001), Prentice Hall
17. Mahmoud H.N, Connor R.J., Bowman C.A.. Results of the fatigue evaluation and field monitoring of the I-39 Northbound Bridge over the Wisconsin River. ATLSS report no. 05-04, Bethlehem (PA, USA): Lehigh University; 2005
18. Marshall S.J.. Evaluation of instrumented-based non-destructive inspection methods for bridges. Master thesis. Boulder (Colorado): University of Colorado, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering; 1996
19. Matlab. Matlab the language of technical computing; Topic: Polyfit. Version 6.5.1, Release 13. 2003
20. Neves L.C., Frangopol D.M., and Cruz P.J.S. Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multiobjective optimization of bridge maintenance: Single maintenance type. J Struct Engrg, ASCE 132 6 (2006) 991-1005
21. Pukl R., Novák D., Bergmeister K.. Reliability assessment of concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the Euro-C conference. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2003. p. 793-803
22. Rovnaník P., Chromá M., Teplý B., Keršner Z.. Durability limit states of concrete structures: Carbonation. In: European symposium ESCS-2006. 2006
23. Stehno G., Straninger W., Bergmeister K.. Verfahren zur Vorhersage des Umfanges von Brückensanierungen. Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten, Straßenforschung, Heft 338; 1987
24. Straub D., and Faber M.H. Computational aspects of risk-based inspection planning. Comput Aided Civil Infrastructure Eng 21 3 (2006) 179-192
25. Strauss A., Frangopol D.M., and Kim S. Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: Bayesian updating. Eng Struct 30 12 (2008) 3667-3679
26. Strauss A., Kala Z., Bergmeister K., Hoffmann S., and Novak D. Technologische Eigenschaften von Stählen im europäischen Vergleich. Stahlbau, Ernst & Sohn 75 1 (2006) 55-60
27. Teplý B., Chromá M., Matesová D., Rovnaník P.. FReET-D. Program Documentation, Part 1 and Part 2. Institute of Structural Mechanics, Fakulty Stavebni, Vysoké Uceni Technické v Brne; 2006