Factors determining citizen's attitudes towards agri-environmental property rights

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 541-561

  Vera Toscano, Esperanza ^a   Gómez Limón, José A ^b   Moyano, Eduardo ^a   Garrido, Fernando ^a  

^a Associated Unit to CSIC by IESA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agri environmental policy; Citizen's attitudes; Environmental implications; Institutional Economics; Property rights

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES; CITIZEN'S ATTITUDES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS; INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS; PROPERTY RIGHT;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL PROVISION; INCOME; POLICY MAKING; PROPERTY RIGHTS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RURAL AREA; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

EID: 55949099859     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9209-9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. J Andreoni 1990 Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving? Econ J 100 401 464 477
2. EJ Austin IJ Deary GJ Gibson MJ McGregor JB Dent 1996 Attitudes and values of Scottish farmers: 'yeoman' and 'entrepreneur' as factors, not distinct types Rural Sociol 61 464 474
3. Bromley DW (1996). The environmental implications of agriculture. Staff Paper 401, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
4. DW Bromley 1997 Constitutional political economy: property claims in a dynamic world Contemp Econ Policy 15 4 43 55
5. DW Bromley I Hodge 1990 Private property rights and presumptive policy entitlements: reconsidering the premises of rural policy Eur Rev Agric Econ 17 2 197 214
6. Buller H, Wilson GA, Höll A (2000) Agri-environmental policy in the European Union. Aldershot, Ashgate
7. Burbank M (1995) How do contextual effects work? Developing a theoretical model. In: Eagles M (eds) Spatial and contextual models in political research. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 165-178
8. Christman J (1994) The myth of property. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Carr S (1988). Conservation of farm: conflicting attitudes, social pressures and behaviour. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Open University
10. AE Clark 1997 Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work? Labour Econ 4 4 341 372
11. JR Clark A Jones CA Potter M Lobley 1997 Conceptualising the evolution of European Unions' agri-environmental policy: a discourse approach Environ Plan 29 1869 1885
12. FP Costa T Rehman 1999 Exploring the link between farmers' objectives and the phenomenon of pasture degradation in the beef production systems of Central Brazil Agric Syst 61 1 135 146
13. SP Cottrell 2003 Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behaviour among recreational boaters Environ Behav 35 3 347 375
14. Diener E. Lucas R. E (1999) Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell sage Foundation, New York, Chap. 11
15. EEA, European Environment Agency (2004) High nature value farmland. Characteristics trends and policy challenges. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
16. EEA, European Environment Agency (2006) Integration of environment into EU agriculture policy - the IRENA indicator-based assessment report, EEA Report No 2/2006, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
17. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2002). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2002-019/3.
18. A Ferrer-i-Carbonell P Frijters 2004 How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J 114 641 659
19. Greene W (1990) Econometric analysis. MacMillan, New York
20. HR Hungerford TL Volk 1990 Changing learner behaviour through environmental education J Environ Educ 21 3 8 21
21. IESA, Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados de Andalucía, (2006) Opinión Pública, Agricultura y Sociedad Rural en Andalucía' (Agrobarómetro 2005), Informe Síntesis. Informes y Monografías E-0304. IESA-CSIC, Córdoba
22. Ilbery BW, Bowler IR (1998) From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In: Ilbery BW (eds) The geography of rural change. Longman, Harlow, pp 57-84
23. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (1999) Foundations of hedonic psychology: scientific perspectives on enjoyment and suffering. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
24. Knierim A, Siebert R (2004) The BIOfACT German report on WP3. Institute of Socioeconomics, ZALF, Müncheberg
25. McEvoy J III (1972) The American concern with the environment. In: Burch WR Jr, Cheek NH Jr, Taylor L (eds) Social behavior, natural resources, and the environment. Harper and Row, New York, pp 214-236
26. McGuire JR (1992) An examination of environmental attitudes among college students. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
27. C Morris C Potter 1995 Recruiting the new conservationists: farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK J Rural Stud 11 1 51 63
28. Moyano E, Garrido F (1996) Spain: social players in the implementation of agri-environmental policy. In: Whitby M (eds) The European environment and CAP reform: policies and prospects for conservation. Wallingford, CAB International, pp 87-96
29. OECD (1998) Agriculture and the environment: issues and policies. OECD, París
30. JJ Oñate JE Malo F Suárez B Peco 1998 Regional and environmental aspects in the implementation of Spanish agri-environmental schemes J Environ Manage 52 3 227 224
31. D Ortiz F Ceña 2002 Efectos de la política agroambiental de la Unión Europea en el mundo rural Información Económica Española 803 105 116
32. Van Ortiz D, Van Estruch V (2004) The role of agri-environmental measures in the definition of property rights. In: Huylenbroeck G, Verbeke W, Lauwers L (eds) Role of institutions in rural policies and agricultural markets. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 335-348
33. Passino EM, Lounsbury JW (1976) Sex differences in opposition to and support for construction of a proposed nuclear power plant. In: Ward LM, Coren S, Gruft A, Collins JB (eds) The behavioral basis of design, book 1. Stroudsburg, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, pp 180-184
34. J Primdahl B Peco J Schramek E Andersend JJ Oñate 2003 Environmental effects of agri-environmental schemes in Western Europe J Environ Manage 67 1 129 138
35. Salamon S (1992) Prairie patrimony. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
36. Scott D, Willits FK, (1991) Environmental concern of Pennsylvania citizens: data from a statewide survey. Technical Report A.E. and R.S. 219, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University
37. Tawney RH (1948) The adquisitive society. Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York
38. KR Tremblay RE Dunlap 1978 Rural-urban residence and concern with environmental quality: a replication and extension Rural Sociology 43 474 91
39. KD Van Liere RE Dunlap 1980 The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence Public Opin Q 44 2 181 197
40. Van Praag Bernard MS (1991) Ordinal and Cardinal Utility. An integration of the two demensions of the Welfare Concept. J Econometrics 50: 69-89(1980)
41. E Vera-Toscano V Ateca R Serrano 2006 Building financial satisfaction Soc Indic Res 77 211 243
42. Whitby M (1996) The European environment and CAP reform: policies and prospects for conservation. CAB International, Wallingford
43. M Whitby 2000 Challenges and options for the UK agri-environment J Agric Econ 51 3 17 32
44. J Willock IJ Deary G Edwards-Jones GJ Gibson MJ McGregor A Sutherland JB Dent O Morgan R Grieve 1999 The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision-making: business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland J Agric Econ 50 2 286 303
45. GA Wilson 1996 Farmers environmental attitudes and ESA participation Geoforum 27 2 115 131
46. GA Wilson K Hart 2001 Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: towards conservation-oriented thinking? Sociol Ruralis 41 2 254 274
47. World Bank (1997) Five years after Rio: innovations in environmental policy, environmentally sustainable development studies and monographs series no.18 (June). World Bank, Washington