Business process modelling through equivalence of activity properties

ICEIS 2008 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 1 ISAS, Issue , 2008, Pages 137-146

  Pereira, Carla Marques ^a   Sousa, Pedro ^a  

^a Link Consulting SA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Activity equivalence; Business process; Process equivalence; Zachman framewok

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY EQUIVALENCE; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; BUSINESS PROCESSES; IT INNOVATIONS; KEY ELEMENTS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL; PROCESS EQUIVALENCE; PROCESS EQUIVALENCES; ZACHMAN FRAMEWOK;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 55949084304     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. C. Batini, S. Ceri, C. Batini: Conceptual Database Design; An Entity-Relationship Approach, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1991
2. Davenport, T.; Short, J.: The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 1990, 11-27,
3. Dietz, J.: O.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Delft; Springer, 2006,
4. Eriksson, H.; Penker, M.: Business Modeling With UML: Business Patterns At Work: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
5. Grover, V., et. al.: The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 1995, 12(1), 109-144.
6. Hammer, M.; Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. London; Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2001.
7. IEEE: IEEE 1471, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000.
8. Inmon, W. et. al.: (1997). Data Stores, Data Warehousing, and the Zachman Framework, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
9. ISO: ISO/IEC 10746 ODP Reference Model, International Standards Organization, 1995,
10. Jagannathan, R.: Data Flow Models, In Zomaya, E. (ed), Parallel and Distributed Computing Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
11. Labovitz, G.; Rosansky, V.: Power of Alignment: How Great Companies Stay Centered and Accomplish Extraordinary Things. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1997.
12. Lankhorst, M. et. al.; Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication, and Analysis. Germany: Springer, 2005.
13. Linz, P.: An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2000.
14. OMG: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, version 2.0.: Object Management Group, 2005, www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2004-10-02.
15. Pereira, C. et.al.: Criteria for Business Process Modeling with the Zachman Framework. 3rd International CIRP Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. Setúbal, Portugal, 2006.
16. Pereira, C.; Sousa, P.: A Method to Define an Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework. In Haddad, H., Omicini, A., Wainwright, R. & Liebrock, L. (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), (pp. 1366-1371), Nicosia, Cyprus, 2004.
17. Pereira, C.; Sousa, P.: Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In Haddad, H., Liebrock, L., Omicini, A. & Wainwright, R. (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (pp. 1344-1345), Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2005.
18. Sousa, P., Caetano, A., Vasnconcelos, A. and Tribolet, J. (2006): Enterprise Architecture Modelling with UML 2.0. In P. Rittgen (Ed.) Enterprise Modeling and Computing with UML (pp. 67-94): Idea Group Inc.
19. Sowa, J. & Zachman, J. (Ed.) (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31, 590-616.
20. W3C (2002). Web Services: World Wide Web Consortium.
21. Zachman, J. (1987). A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292.