Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese

Studies in Language

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 568-589

  Bisang, Walter ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849153574     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.32.3.05bis     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 1998. Word formation in Old Chinese. New approaches to Chinese word formation. Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, Jerome L. Packard (ed.), 35-76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
2. Bisang, Walter. 2004. Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, Walter Bisang; Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), 109-138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
3. Bisang, Walter. 2008. Precategoriality and argument structure in Late Archaic Chinese, Constructional Reorganization, Jaako Leino (ed.), 55-88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Bisang, Walter. Forthcoming a. Word classes. The Oxford handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jong Song (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bisang, Walter. forthcoming b. Underspecification and the noun/verb distinction: Late Archaic Chinese and Khmer. The discourse potential of underspecified structures: Event structures and information structures, Anita Steube (ed.). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
6. Broschart, Jürgen. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1(2): 123-165.
7. Croft, William A. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
8. Croft, William A. 2000. Parts of speech as typological universals and as language particular categories. Approaches to the typology of word classes, Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds.), 65-102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Croft, William A. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Downer, G. B. 1959. Derivation by tone-change in Classical Chinese. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 22: 258-290.
11. Evans, Nicholas & Osada, Toshiki. 2005. Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3): 351-390.
12. Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik. Mit Ausschluss des niederen Stiles und der heutigen Umgangssprache. Leipzig: Weigel.
13. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. Speech acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 41-58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
16. Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jap Van Marle (eds.), 43-66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Haudricourt, André. 1954. Comment reconstruire le chinois archa-dsique. Word 10: 351-364.
18. Kennedy, George A. 1964. Selected works of George A. Kennedy. New Haven, CT: Far Eastern Publications.
19. Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. Middlesex: Penguin.
20. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Mei, Tsu-lin. 1980. Sisheng bieyi zhong de shijian cengci (Chronological strata in derivation by tone). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 427-443.
22. Mei, Tsu-lin. 1989. The causative and denominative functions of the s-prefix in Old Chinese. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology, Academia Sinica, sections on Linguistics and Paleography, 33-51. Taipei.
23. Michaelis, Laura. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1-67.
24. Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Sasse, Hans-J-dsurgen. 1993a. Syntactic categories and subcategories. Syntax, Joachim Jacobs; Arnim von Stechow; Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), 646-686. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1993b. Das Nomen - eine universale Kategorie? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 187-221.
28. Schachter, Paul. 1985. Parts of speech systems. Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause structure. Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1-61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wang, Li. 1958. Hanyueyu yanjiu (Research on Sino-Vietnamese). Hanyu Shilun Wenji, 290-410.