Pareto dominance - based approach for the component selection problem

Proceedings - EMS 2008, European Modelling Symposium, 2nd UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modelling and Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 58-63

  Vescan, Andreea ^a  

^a BABE BOLYAI UNIVERSITY   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PARETO PRINCIPLE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPONENT SELECTIONS; EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION TECHNIQUES; IN COMPONENTS; MULTIOBJECTIVE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; SOFTWARE COMPONENTS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 55849146634     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMS.2008.16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. A. Abraham, L. Jain, and R. Goldberg. Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: Theoretical Advances and Applications. Springer Verlag, London, 2005.
2. C. Alves and J. Castro. Pore: Procurement-oriented requirements engineering method for the component based systems engineering development paradigm. In Int'l Conf. Software Eng. CBSE Workshop, 1999., 1999.
3. C. Alves and J. Castro. A systematic method for cots component selection. In Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 2001.
4. P. Baker, M. Harman, K. Steinhofel, and A. Skaliotis. Search based approaches to component selection and prioritization for the next release problem. In ICSM'06: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pages 176-185, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
5. I. Crnkovic and M. Larsson. Building Reliable Component-Based Software Systems. Artech House publisher, 2002.
6. M. R. Fox, D. C. Brogan, and J. Paul F. Reynolds. Approximating component selection. In WSC'04: Proceedings of the 36th conference on Winter simulation, pages 429-434. Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.
7. L. Gesellensetter and S. Glesner. Only the best can make it: Optimal component selection. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 176(2):105-124, 2007.
8. C. Grosan. A comparison of several evolutionary models and representations for multiobjeclive optimization. ISE Book Series on Real Word Multi-Objective System Engineerin, chapter 3, Nova Science, 2005.
9. N. Haghpanah, S. Moaven, J. Habibi, M. Kargar, and S. H. Yeganeh. Approximation algorithms for software component selection problem. In APSEC, pages 159-166. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
10. J. Kontio, Otso: A systematic process for reusable software component selection, 1995.
11. A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gómez-Pérez. Baremo: how to choose the appropriate software component using the analytic hierarchy process. In SEKE'02: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, pages 781-788, New York, NY USA, 2002. ACM. f 121 E. Mancebo and A. Andrews. A strategy for selecting multiple components. In SAC'05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 1505-1510, New York. NY, USA, 2005. ACM.