Deception and computer-mediated communication in daily life

Communication Reports

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 92-103

  George, Joey F ^a   Robb, Alastair ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Deception; Diary studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849142603     PISSN: 08934215     EISSN: 17451043     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08934210802298108     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, D., Field, D., Collins, P. A., Lord, E. P., & Nathan, J. (1985). Estimates of young children's time with television: A methodological comparison of parent reports with time-elapse video home observation. Child Development, 56, 1345-1357.
2. Burgoon, J., Stoner, G., Bonito, J., & Dunbar, N. (2003). Trust and deception in mediated communication. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-11). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. Carlson, J., George, J., Burgoon, J., Adkins, M., & White, C. (2004). Deception in computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 5-28.
4. Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-170.
5. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
6. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements: Media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
7. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
8. DePaulo, B., Kashy, D., Kirkendol, S., Wyer, M., & Epstein, J. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
9. Enpocket. (2004). Enpocket's mobile media monitor charts strong adoption of US mobile data services. Retrieved May 21, 2008, from http://www.enpocket.com/news/press-releases/news_listing?b_start:int= 10&year=2004
10. Green, A. S., Rafaeli, E., Eastwick, P., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Paper or plastic: Do paper and pencil versus electronic diaries produce different results? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
11. Greenberg, B. S., Eastin, M. S., Skalski, P., Cooper, L., Levy, M., & Lachlan, K. (2005). Comparing survey and diary measures of Internet and traditional media use. Communication Reports, 18, 1-8.
12. Hancock, J., Thom-Santelli, J., & Ritchie, T. (2004). Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. CHI 2004, 6, 129-134.
13. Mobile Marketing Messenger (2005). Enpocket's mobile media monitor US reveals mobile phone ownership is now greater than home Internet penetration. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://mmaglobal.com/external/ messenger/05_April_MMA_Messenger.html
14. Rice, R. E., & Associates (Ed.) (1984). The new media: Communication, research, and technology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
15. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
16. Zhou, L. (2005). An empirical investigation of deception behavior in instant messaging. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 147-160.