Nonlocal Ginzburg-Landau equation for cortical pattern formation

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Bressloff, Paul C ^a   Kilpatrick, Zachary P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE EQUATIONS; BIFURCATION PARAMETERS; CONDUCTION VELOCITIES; COUPLING STRENGTHS; DYNAMICAL INSTABILITIES; GL EQUATIONS; LANDAU EQUATIONS; LOCAL NETWORKS; LOCAL PARTS; NONLOCAL COUPLINGS; PATTERN FORMATIONS; PERTURBATION EXPANSIONS; PRIMARY VISUAL CORTICES; PROPAGATION DELAYS; RECURRENT NETWORKS; SPATIAL CORRELATIONS; SPONTANEOUS PATTERN FORMATIONS; TUNING PROPERTIES; VISUAL STIMULUS;

EID: 55849132525     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.041916     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65. 851 65, 851 (1993).
2. R. Hoyle, Pattern Formation: An Introduction to Methods. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006).
3. A. C. Newell and J. A. Whitehead, J. Fluid Mech. 10.1017/ S0022112069000176 38, 279 (1969).
4. L. A. Segel, J. Fluid Mech. 10.1017/S0022112069000127 38, 203 (1969).
5. Y. Nishiura, Far-from Equilibrium Dynamics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002).
6. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer, New York, 1984).
7. D. Tanaka and Y. Kuramoto, Phys. Rev. E 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026219 68, 026219 (2003).
8. Y. Kuramoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 10.1143/PTP.94.321 94, 321 (1995).
9. Y. Kuramoto and H. Nakao, Physica D 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00264-3 103, 294 (1997).
10. P. C. Bressloff, J. D. Cowan, M. Golubitsky, P. J. Thomas, and M. Wiener, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 10.1098/rstb.2000.0769 356, 299 (2001).
11. P. C. Bressloff, J. D. Cowan, M. Golubitsky, and P. J. Thomas, Nonlinearity 10.1088/0951-7715/14/4/305 14, 739 (2001).
12. P. C. Bressloff, J. D. Cowan, M. Golubitsky, P. J. Thomas, and M. Wiener, Neural Comput. 10.1162/089976602317250861 14, 473 (2002).
13. P. C. Bressloff and J. D. Cowan, Neural Comput. 10.1162/ 089976602317250870 14, 493 (2002).
14. P. C. Bressloff and J. D. Cowan, in Nonlinear Dynamics: Where do We Go From Here?, edited by, S. J. Hogan, A. Champneys and B. Krauskopf, (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 2002), Chap..
15. D. G. Aronson, G. B. Ermentrout, and N. Kopell, Physica D 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90007-C 41, 403 (1990).
16. F. H. Hoppensteadt and E. M. Izhikevich, Weakly Connected Neural Networks (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
17. J. D. Drover and G. B. Ermentrout, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 10.1137/S0036139902412617 63, 1627 (2003).
18. S. LeVay and S. B. Nelson, in The Neural Basis of Visual Function, edited by, A. G. Leventhal, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991), pp. 266-315.
19. N. V. Swindale, Network Comput. Neural Syst. 10.1088/0954-898X/7/2/002 7, 161 (1996).
20. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, J. Comp. Neurol. 10.1002/cne.901580304 158, 267 (1974).
21. The cortex is, of course, three dimensional, since it has nonzero thickness with a distinctive layered structure. However, one finds that cells with similar feature preferences tend to arrange themselves in vertical columns so that to a first approximation the layered structure of cortex can be ignored. However, it is important to note that there can be functional differences between neurons in distinct layers within the same column so that certain care has to be taken in ignoring the third dimension. Given that optical imaging studies measure the response properties of superficial layers of cortex, we consider a model based on the structure of these layers.
22. G. G. Blasdel and G. Salama, Nature (London) 10.1038/321579a0 321, 579 (1986).
23. G. G. Blasdel, J. Neurosci. 12, 3139 (1992).
24. T. Bonhoeffer, D. S. Kim, D. Malonek, D. Shoham, and A. Grinvald, Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 1973 (1995). 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00720.x
25. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, J. Comp. Neurol. 10.1002/cne.901580305 158, 295 (1974).
26. J. S. Lund, A. Angelucci, and P. C. Bressloff, Cereb. Cortex 13, 15 (2003). 10.1093/cercor/13.1.15
27. R. Douglas, C. Koch, M. Mahowald, K. Martin, and H. Suarez, Science 269, 981 (1995). 10.1126/science.7638624
28. J. Marino, J. Schummers, D. C. Lyon, L. Schwabe, O. Beck, P. Wiesing, K. Obermayer, and M. Sur, Nat. Neurosci. 8, 194 (2005). 10.1038/nn1391
29. R. Ben-Yishai, R. Lev Bar-Or, and H. Sompolinsky, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844 92, 3844 (1995).
30. D. C. Somers, S. Nelson, and M. Sur, J. Neurosci. 15, 5448 (1995).
31. K. S. Rockland and J. Lund, J. Comp. Neurol. 10.1002/cne.902160307 216, 303 (1983).
32. C. D. Gilbert and T. N. Wiesel, J. Neurosci. 3, 1116 (1983).
33. R. Malach, Y. Amir, M. Harel, and A. Grinvald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10469 90, 10469 (1993).
34. T. Yoshioka, G. G. Blasdel, J. B. Levitt, and J. S. Lund, Cereb. Cortex 6, 297 (1996). 10.1093/cercor/6.2.297
35. W. H. Bosking, Y. Zhang, B. Schofield, and D. Fitzpatrick, J. Neurosci. 17, 2112 (1997).
36. L. C. Sincich and G. G. Blasdel, J. Neurosci. 21, 4416 (2001).
37. A. Angelucci, J. B. Levitt, E. J. S. Walton, J.-M. Hupé, J. Bullier, and J. S. Lund, J. Neurosci. 22, 8633 (2002).
38. A. Angelucci and P. C. Bressloff, Prog. Brain Res. 154, 93 (2006). 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54005-1
39. A. Shmuel, M. Korman, M. Harel, S. Ullman, R. Malach, and A. Grinvald, J. Neurosci. 25, 2117 (2005). 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137-04.2005
40. J. D. Hirsch and C. D. Gilbert, J. Physiol. (London) 160, 106 (1991).
41. L. J. Toth, S. C. Rao, D. S. Kim, D. C. Somers, and M. Sur, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9869 93, 9869 (1996).
42. C. D. Gilbert, A. Das, M. Ito, M. Kapadia, and G. Westheimer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.615 93, 615 (1996).
43. D. Fitzpatrick, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 438 (2000). 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00113-6
44. J. Bullier, J. M. Hupé, A. J. James, and P. Girard, Prog. Brain Res. 134, 193 (2001). 10.1016/S0079-6123(01)34014-1
45. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Biophys. J. 12, 1 (1972).
46. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Kybernetik 10.1007/BF00288786 13, 55 (1973).
47. G. B. Ermentrout, Rep. Prog. Phys. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/4/002 61, 353 (1998).
48. S. Coombes, Biol. Cybern. 10.1007/s00422-005-0574-y 93, 91 (2005).
49. P. C. Bressloff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.088101 89, 088101 (2002).
50. P. C. Bressloff, Physica D 10.1016/S0167-2789(03)00238-0 185, 131 (2003).
51. L. Schwabe, K. Obermayer, A. Angelucci, and P. C. Bressloff, J. Neurosci. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1253-06.2006 26, 9117 (2006).
52. D. J. Wielaard, M. J. Shelley, D. W. McLaughlin, and R. Shapley, J. Neurosci. 21, 5203 (2001).
53. R. B. Tootell, M. S. Silverman, E. Switkes, and R. L. DeValois, Science 10.1126/science.7134981 218, 902 (1982).
54. E. Schwartz, Biol. Cybern. 10.1007/BF01885636 25, 181 (1977).
55. G. G. Blasdel and D. Campbell, J. Neurosci. 21, 8286 (2001).
56. H. Yu, B. J. Farley, D. Z. Jin, and M. Sur, Neuron 47, 267 (2005). 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.011
57. T. I. Baker and N. P. Issa, J. Neurophysiol. 94, 775 (2005). 10.1152/jn.01093.2004
58. A. Basole, L. E. White, and D. Fitzpatrick, Nature (London) 423, 986 (2003). 10.1038/nature01721
59. A similar decomposition was previously carried out in continuum versions of the coupled hypercolumn model, except that d0, d1 →0 and, hence, the local part reduced to w (θ- θ′) δ (r- r′) and the long-range connections did not have a gap.
60. P. E. Maldonado, I. Godecke, C. M. Gray, and T. Bonhoeffer, Science 10.1126/science.276.5318.1551 276, 1551 (1997).
61. J. Schummers, J. Marino, and M. Sur, Neuron 36, 969 (2002). 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01012-7
62. I. Nauhaus, A. Benucci, M. Carandini, and D. L. Ringach, Neuron 57, 673 (2008). 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.020
63. D. Mclaughlin, R. Shapley, M. Shelley, and D. J. Wielaard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.110135097 97, 8087 (2000).
64. D. Cai, L. Tao, M. Shelley, and D. W. Mclaughlin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.0401906101 101, 7757 (2004).
65. P. C. Bressloff and J. D. Cowan, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 358, 1643 (2003). 10.1098/rstb.2002.1109
66. G. Singh, F. Memoli, T. Ishkhanov, G. Sapiro, G. Carlsson, and D. L. Ringach, J. Vision 8, 1 (2008). 10.1167/8.8.11
67. P. Girard, J. M. Hupé, and J. Bullier, J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1328 (2001).
68. J. J. Wright and D. T. J. Liley, Biol. Cybern. 10.1007/BF00202790 72, 347 (1995).
69. V. K. Jirsa and H. Haken, Physica D 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00166-2 99, 503 (1997).
70. P. C. Bressloff and S. Coombes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10.1142/ S0217979297001209 11, 2343 (1997).
71. D. Golomb and G. B. Ermentrout, Network Comput. Neural Syst. 10.1088/0954-898X/11/3/304 11, 221 (2000).
72. P. A. Robinson, P. N. Loxley, S. C. O'Connor, and C. J. Rennie, Phys. Rev. E 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.041909 63, 041909 (2001).
73. S. Coombes, G. J. Lord and M. R. Owen, Physica D 10.1016/S0167-2789(03) 00002-2 178, 219 (2003).
74. A. Hutt, M. Bestehorn, and T. Wennekers, Network Comput. Neural Syst. 10.1088/0954-898X/14/2/310 14, 351 (2003).
75. F. M. Atay and A. Hutt, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 10.1137/S0036139903430884 65, 644 (2005).
76. N. A. Venkov, S. Coombes, and P. C. Matthews, Physica D 10.1016/j.physd.2007.04.011 232, 1 (2007).
77. G. B. Ermentrout and J. D. Cowan, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 34, 137 (1979).
78. The dispersion relation 4.20 with λ± = ρ± +i ω± is in fact symmetric with respect to the transformation ω± →± ω± so that standing waves could also occur.
79. One way to handle this infinite degeneracy is to restrict the space of solutions to that of doubly periodic functions corresponding to regular tilings of the plane. The original Euclidean symmetry group is then restricted to the symmetry group of the underlying lattice. In particular, there are only a finite number of rotations and reflections to consider for each lattice (modulo an arbitrary rotation of the whole plane), which correspond to the so-called holohedries of the plane. Consequently the corresponding space of marginally stable modes is now finite-dimensional-we can only rotate eigenfunctions through a finite set of angles (for example, multiples of n/2 for a square lattice and multiples of n/3 for an hexagonal lattice). The linear eigenmodes now consist of a finite linear combination of either even (+) or odd (-) stationary plane waves z (r) = n=1 N e-2i φn [cn ei kn r ± c̄ n e-i kn r]. Here N=2 for a square or rhombic lattice and N=3 for an hexagonal lattice. Also k1 k2 = kc2 cos φ with φ=π/2 for N=2, and φ=2π/3 for N=3 with k3 =- k1 - k2. Note that perturbation methods can be used to derive amplitude equations for the coefficients cn, although the basic structure of these equations can be deduced using symmetry arguments.
80. M. Golubitsky, L. J. Shiau, and A. Török, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 10.1137/S1111111102409882 2, 97 (2003).
81. G. B. Ermentrout and J. D. Cowan, J. Math. Biol. 10.1007/BF00275728 7, 265 (1979).
82. A. Hutt, A. Longtin and L. Schimansky-Geier, Physica D 237, 755 (2008). 10.1016/j.physd.2007.10.013
83. D. Cai, L. Tao, A. A. Rangan, and D. W. Mclaughlin, Commun. Math. Sci. 4, 97 (2006).
84. P. R. Roelfsema, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 203 (2006). 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112939