Animal markers assisted selection in South America: A point of view

Recent Patents on DNA and Gene Sequences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 133-139

  Rogberg Muñoz, Andrés ^a,c   Prando, Alberto ^b   Baldo, Andrés ^b   Peral García, Pilar ^a   Giovambattista, Guillermo ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA   (Argentina)

^b FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Animal genetic resources; DNA test; Gene patent; Genetic disease diagnosis; Genetic identification; Genetic markers; Marker assisted selection

Indexed keywords

DNA MARKER;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RESOURCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; NONHUMAN; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOUTH AMERICA; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; GENETIC MARKERS; HUMANS; PATENTS AS TOPIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SOUTH AMERICA;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 55849118830     PISSN: 18722156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/187221508784534159     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Sax K. The association of size differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 1923; 8: 552-560.
2. Neimann-Sørensen A, Robertson A. The association between blood groups and several production characters in three Danish cattle breeds. Acta Agr Scand 1961; 11: 163-196.
3. Weber JL, May PE. Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 1989; 44: 388-396.
4. Litt M, Luty JA. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Hum Genet 1989; 44 397-401.
5. Glowatzki-Mullis, ML Gaillard C, Wigger G, Fries R. Microsatellite-based parentage control in cattle, Anim Genet 1995; 26: 7-12.
6. Vignal A, Milan D, Sancristobal M, Eggen A. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet Sel Evol 2002; 34: 275-305.
7. Hocquette JF, Lehnert S, Barendse W, Cassar-Malek I, Picard B. Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their application to beef quality. Animal 2007; 1: 159-173.
8. Antin PB, Konieczka JH. Genomic resources for chicken. Developmental Dynamics 2005; 232(4): 877-882.
9. Gao Y, Zhang R, Hu X, Li N. Application of genomic technologies to the improvement of meat quality of farm animals. Meat Sci 2007; 77: 36-45.
10. Wernersson R, Schierup MH, Jorgensen FG, et al. Pigs in sequence space: A 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing. BMC Genomics 2005; 6(1): 70.
11. Womack JE. Advances in livestock genomics: Opening the barn door. Genome Res 2005; 15(12): 1699-1705.
12. Law AS, Archibald AL. Farm animal genome databases. Brief Bioinform 2000; 1(2), 151-160.
13. Dekkers JC. Commercial application of marker- and geneassisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons. J Anim Sci 2004; 82(E-Suppl.): E313-E328.
14. Bennewitz J, Reinsch N, Thomsen H, et al. Marker assisted selection in German Holstein dairy cattle breeding: outline of the program and marker assisted breeding value estimation. Ann Meet Europ Ass Anim Prod Rome Italy (2003).
15. Boichard D, Fritz S, Rossignol MN, Guillaume F, Colleau JJ, Druet T. Implementation of marker-assisted selection: practical lessons from dairy cattle. Proc 8th World Cong Genet Appl Livest Prod Belo Horizonte Brazil (2006).
16. Weller JI. Current and future developments in patents for quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. Recent Patents on DNA & Gene Sequences 2007; 1: 69-76.
17. Statistical Briefer. Canfax Research Services. 2007. http://www.canfax.ca/general/StatBrf.PDF Accesion date: 29/dec/2007
18. Estadísticas del Sector Lacteo 2006. Boletin Informativo DIEA. 2007: TE255. http://www.mgap.gub.uy/diea/encuestas/Te255/ Te255_Documento1.htm#3 Accesion date: 29/dec/2007.
19. Constanza V. Brazil's booming agriculture faces obstacles. Amber Waves 2007; 4 (5): 28-35.
20. Tvedt MW, Hiemstra SJ, Drucker AG, Louwaars N, Oldenbroek K. Legal aspects of exchange, use and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. The Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2007; FNI-Report 1/2007.
21. Rosendal GK. 'Regulating the use of genetic resources between international authorities'. European Environment 2006; 16(5): 265-277.
22. Tvedt MW. How will a substantive patent law treaty affect the public domain for genetic resources and biological material? J World Intellect Prop 2005; 8(3): 311-344.
23. Ingressia A, Manzella D, Martyniuk E. The legal framework for the management of animal genetic resources. FAO Legislative Study 89. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy (2005).
24. Dutfield, G. Biotechnology and patents: What are developing countries doing about article 27.3(b)? Bridges 2001; 5(9): 17-18.
25. European patent office. Study on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)/ haplotype databases and search tools for examiners (Status Report). Trilateral Technical conference. Washington, USA (2004).
26. International association for the protection of intellectual property (AIPPI). Committee Q150 patentability requirements and scope of protection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and entire genomes http://www.aippi.org/reports/ q150/. Accesion date 5/dec/2007.
27. Alison, 2006 Alison VE. DNA- based technologies. Beef sire selection manual National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium 2006; 66-73.
28. Van der Werf J, Kinghorn B. Beef breeding technologies 3. Marker assisted selection. DPI&F Note. Tropical Beef Centre Queensland Australia (1999). http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/beef/2240.html Accesion date: 11/oct/2007.
29. Mullen AM, Stapleton PC, Corcoran D, Hamill RM, White A. Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches. Meat Sci 2006; 74(1), 3-16.
30. Gibson JP. Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci. Proc 5th World Cong Genet Appl Livest Prod 1994; 21: 201-204.
31. Larzul C, Manfredi E, Elsen JM. Potential gain from including major gene information in breeding value estimation. Genet Sel Evol 1997; 29: 161-184.
32. Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME. The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes. Genet Sel Evol 1996; 28:161-176.
33. Ruane J, Colleau JJ. Marker assisted selection for genetic improvement of animal populations when a single QTL is marked. Genet Res 1995; 66: 71-83.
34. Ruane J, Colleau JJ. Marker-assisted selection for a sex-limited character in a nucleus breeding population. J Dairy Sci 1996; 79: 1666-1678.
35. Van der Beek S, van Arendonk JAM. Marker assisted selection in a poultry breeding program. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production Guelph 1994; 21: 237-240.
36. Dekkers JCM. Optimizing strategies for selection on major genes. National Poultry Breeders Roundtable Discussions. St Louis USA (1998).
37. Hayes B, Goddard ME. Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises Livest Prod Sci 2003; 81: 197-211.
38. Dekkers JCM. Marker and gene-assisted selection in livestock beef improvement federation. 8th Genetic Prediction Workshop "Molecular Approaches To Genetic Improvement". Kansas City, Missouri, USA (2003).
39. Berger H. Igenity simposyum. Buenos Aires Argentina (2007).
40. Murphy D. Electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture 2003. http://www.fao.org/biotech/logs/C10/171103.htm Accesion date: 11/oct/2007.