Modeling architectural level repair in web services

Webist 2007 - 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn IT, Issue , 2007, Pages 240-245

  Moo Mena, Francisco ^a,b   Drira, Khalil ^a  

^a LAAS CNRS   (France)

^b Facultad de Matemdticas   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Architecture model; Architecture reconfiguration; Repair actions; UML; Web services

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL LEVELS; ARCHITECTURE MODEL; BEHAVIORAL LEVEL; LOW QUALITIES; MISSING DATA; MODEL BASED APPROACH; NETWORK FAULTS; RECONFIGURATION ACTIONS; RECONFIGURATION MECHANISMS; SERVICE EXECUTION; STANDARD SOLUTIONS; UML;

ARCHITECTURE; ERRORS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; REPAIR;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 55849088876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Baresi, L., Heckel, R., Thöne, S., and Varró, D. (2003). Modeling and validation of service-oriented architectures: Application vs. style. In ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pages 68-77.
2. Dashofy, E. M., van der Hoek, A., and Taylor, R. N. (2002). Towards architecture-based self-healing systems. In WOSS, pages 21-26.
3. Garlan, D., Monroe, R., and Wile, D. (2000). Acme: Architectural description of component-based systems. In Foundations of Component-Based Systems. Leavens, G.T., andSitaraman, M.(eds), pages 47-68. Cambridge University Press.
4. Garlan, D. and Schmerl, B. (2002). Model-based adaptation for self-healing systems. In WOSS '02: Proceedings of the first workshop on Self-healing systems, pages 27-32, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
5. Georgiadis, I., Magee, J., and Kramer, J. (2002). Self-organising software architectures for distributed systems. In WOSS '02: Proceedings of the first workshop on Self-healing systems, pages 33-38, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
6. Gurguis, S. A. and Zeid, A. (2005). Towards autonomic web services: achieving self-healing using web services. In DEAS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Design and evolution of autonomic application software, pages 1-5, NY, USA. ACM Press.
7. Inverardi, P. and Wolf, A. (1995). Formal specification and analysis of software architectures using the chemical abstract machine. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(4):373-386.
8. IST (2006). The web services diagnosability, monitoring and diagnostic project, http://wsdiamond.di.unito.it.
9. J. Magee, N. Dulay, S. Eisenbach and J. Kramer (1995). Specifying distributed software architectures. In Proceeding of the 5th European Software Engineering Conference, ESEC '95.
10. Koopman, P. (2003). Elements of the self-healing system problem space. In Proceeding of the Workshop on Software Architectures for Dependable Systems.
11. Le Metayer, D. (1998). Describing software architecture styles using graph grammars. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(7):521-533.
12. OMG (2005). Unified modeling language specification. Technical Report Infrastructure Version 2.0.formal/05-07-04, Object Management Group.
13. Shin, M. E. (2005). Self-healing components in robust software architecture for concurrent and distributed systems. Sci. Comput. Program., 57(1):27-44.
14. Wile, D. S. and Egyed, A. (2004). An externalized infrastructure for self-healing systems. In Proceedings of the Fourth Working IEEE/IF1P Conference on Software Architecture. IEEE Computer Society.