How to select candidates for lateral unicompartmental prosthesis

Current Orthopaedic Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 451-458

  Servien, Elvire ^a,b   Aitsiselmi, Tarik ^a,b   Neyret, Philippe ^a,b,c   Verdonk, Peter ^a,b  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c Centre Livet   (France)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Valgus

Indexed keywords

FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 55749112509     PISSN: 19407041     EISSN: 19417551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e32830bada6     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 1988; 228:171-177.
2. Cartier P, Chaib S, Vanvooren P. Unicompartmental prosthetic replacement of the knee. Apropos of 159 casesa maximum follow-up of 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop. 1987; 73:130-133.
3. Newman JH. Why do I do so many unicompartmental knee replacements? In: La prothèse du genou. Montpel-lier: Sauramps medical; 2004;287-292.
4. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999; 70:170-175.
5. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1998; 80:983-989.
6. Ashraf T, Newmann JH, Evans RL, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Joint Surg B. 2002; 8:1126-1130.
7. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29:600-613.
8. International Knee Documentation Committee. IKDC Evaluation Form. Available at: www.sportsmed.org/research/docs/IKDC.pdf; www.esska.org/pdf/ IKDCeng.pdf.
9. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, et al. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompart mental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84:351-355.
10. Gunther T, Murray DW, Miller R. Lateral unicompart mental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996; 3:33-39.
11. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop. 1987; 221:278-285.
12. Jenny JY, Boéri C, Ballonzoli L, et al. Difficulties and reproducibility of radiological measurement of the proximal tibial axis according to Lévigne. Rev Chir Orthop. 2005; 91:658-663.
13. Servien E, Neyret P, Deschamps G. Prothèses unicom-partimentales: prothèse condylienne de resurfaçage. In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2004:263-266.
14. Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, et al. Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthro plasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg B. 2002; 84:653-657.
15. Emerson RH, Thomas H, Thomas R, et al. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop. 2002; 404:62-70.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system. Knee Surg Sports Tranmatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11:40-45.