Natural orifice translumenal surgery: From scales to symphonies

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 674-681

  Finkelberg, Dmitry L ^a   Wassef, Wahid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

NOSCAR (Natural orifice surgery consortium for assessment and research committee); NOTES (Natural orifice translumenal endoscopie surgery); Platforms; Spatial orientation

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; APPENDECTOMY; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DEVICE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER BIOPSY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMENAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; REVIEW; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION;

ANIMALS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; HUMANS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 55749108876     PISSN: 02671379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328313b969     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Kalloo A, Kantsevoy SV, Singh VK, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastroenterology 2000; 118:A1039.
2. Pearl J, Marks J, Ponsky J. Hybrid surgery: combined laparoscopy and natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:325-332.
3. Rao G, Reddy N, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:361-370. Excellent summary of all the available reported case reports of NOTES procedures in humans.
4. Fong D, Pai R, Thompson C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:312-318.
5. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, et al. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:428-434.
6. Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Napper CA, Cadeddu JA. Transvaginal laparoscoplc nephrectomy: development and feasibility in the porcine animal model. Urology 2002; 59:446-450.
7. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:114-117.
8. Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Schmitt T, et al. Retroperitoneal endoscopic debridement for infected peripancreatic necrosis. Lancet 2000; 356:653-655.
9. Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62:287-292.
10. Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park PO, et al. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:307-312.
11. Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, et al. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:542-547.
12. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars: report of translumenal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 2007; 142:823-826.
13. Rattner D, Kalloo A, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery challenges. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:329-333.
14. Swain P. A justification for NOTES - natural orifice translumenal endosurgery. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:514-516.
15. Mintz Y, Talamini M, Cullen J. Evolution of laparoscopic surgery: lessons for NOTES. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:225-234.
16. McGee M, Marks J, Onders R, et al. Infectious complications of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube closure: a quantitative bacteriologic study in the porcine model. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (Suppl):S333.
17. Wichmann M, Huttl T, Winter H, et al, Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 2005; 140:692-697.
18. Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan R. Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85:1-18.
19. Matthes K, Yusuf TE, Willingham FF, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic transgastric distal pancreatectomy in a porcine animal model. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66:762-766.
20. Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, et al. Risk factors of postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138:314-324.
21. Bratzler D, Houck P. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg 2005; 189:395-404.
22. Merrifield B, Wagh M, Thompson C. Peroral transgastric organ resection in the abdomen: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:693-697.
23. Schippers E, Schippers E, Tittel A, Öttinger A, Schumpelick V. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig Surg 1998; 15:145-147.
24. Polymenas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E. A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:41-43.
25. Bowery DJ, Blom D, Crookes PF, et al. Risk factors and the prevalence of trocar site herniation after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:663-666.
26. Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2007; 243:181-188.
27. Romagnuolo J, Cotton P. Designing clinical trials for NOTES. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:371-385.
28. Kantsevoy S. Infection prevention in NOTES. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:291-296. Excellent review on the best approach to Infection prevention in NOTES procedures.
29. Martinsen T, Bergh K, Waldum H. Gastric juice: a barrier against infectious diseases. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 96:94-102.
30. Tryba M, Cook D. Gastric alkaliniration, pneumonia, and systemic infections: the controversy. Scan J Gastroenterol 1995; 210 (Suppl):53-59.
31. Lamade W, Hochberger J. Transgastric surgery: avoiding pitfalls in the development of a new technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 698-700.
32. Goldstone A, Kennedy N, Metcalfe M. Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2005; 92:409-414.
33. Hawes R. Transition from laboratory to clinical practice in NOTES: role of NOSCAR. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:333-341.
34. Wagh M, Thompson C. Surgery insight: natural orifice translumenal endoscopie surgery: an analysis of work to date. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4:386-392.
35. Sumiyama K, Gostout C. Techniques for transgastric access to the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:235-244. Superb review of the techniques currently available for transgastric access in NOTES procedures.
36. Rao VG, Sriram PV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Endoscopic transgastric peritoneoscopy as a potential alternative to laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:AB396.
37. Ryou M, Thompson C. Techniques for transanal access to the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:245-260. Very good review of the techniques available for transanal access in NOTES procedures.
38. Swanstrom L, Zheng B. Spatial orientation and off-axis challenges for notes. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:315-324.
39. Wagh M, Merrifield B, Thompson C. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a procine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3:892-896.
40. Swain P. NOTES and anastomosis. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:261-277.
41. Swanstrom L. Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9:1129-1137.
42. Fong D. Transcolonic access to the peritoneal cavity using a novel incision and closure device. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:AB233.
43. Pasricha P. A next generation therapeutic endoscope: development of a novel endolumenal surgery system with 'birds-eye' visualization and triangulation instruments. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61:AB106.
44. Hu B. Endoscopic suturing without extracorporeal knots: a laboratory study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62:230-233.
45. Mummadi R, Pasricha P. The eagle or the snake: platforms for NOTES and radical endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:279-289. Excellent discussion of what platforms are, the different types and their impact on NOTES procedures.
46. Bardaro S, Swanstrom L Development of advanced endoscopes for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Therapy Allied Technol 2006; 15:378-383.
47. Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D, et al. Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:585-591.
48. Giday S, Magno P, Kalloo A. NOTES: the future. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008; 18:387-395.
49. Reavis KM, Melvin WS. Advanced endoscopic technologies. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1533-1546.