Heterogeneous responses of firms to trade protection

Journal of International Economics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 371-383

  Konings, Jozef ^b   Vandenbussche, Hylke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b LICOS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Antidumping protection; C2; F13; Firm heterogeneity; L 41; O30; Total factor productivity

Indexed keywords

ANTIDUMPING; HETEROGENEITY; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; TRADE RELATIONS;

EID: 55749097649     PISSN: 00221996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amiti M., and Konings J. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review 97 5 (2007) 1611-1638
2. Abadie A. Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies 72 (2005) 1-19
3. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., and Howitt P. Competition and innovation: an inverted U-shape. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 2 (2005) 701-728
4. Baltagi B.H., and Wu P.X. Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbance. Econometric Theory 15 (1999) 814-823
5. Bernard A.B., Redding S., and Schott P. Multi-Product Firms and Product Switching.revised version of NBER-paper 9789 (2006) 1-35
6. Blonigen B., and Park J.H. Dynamic pricing in the presence of antidumping policy: theory and evidence. American Economic Review 91 1 (2004) 134-154
7. Boone J. Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 31 3 (2000) 549-569
8. Budd J., Konings J., and Slaughter M. Wages and international rent-sharing in multinational firms. Review of Economics and Statistics 87 1 (2005) 124-134
9. De Loecker J. Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics 73 (2007) 69-98
10. Ederington J., and McCalman P. Endogenous firm heterogeneity and the dynamics of trade liberalization. Journal of International Economics 74 (2008) 422-440
11. Harrison A.E. Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics 36 (1994) 53-73
12. Head C.K., and Ries J. Rationalization effects of tariff reductions. Journal of International Economics 47 2 (1999) 295-320
13. Heckman J., Hidehiko I., and Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a jobs training program. Review of Economic Studies 64 (1997) 605-654
14. Helpman E. Trade, FDI and the organization of the firm. Journal of Economic Literature XLIV 3 (2006) 589-630
15. Helpman E., Melitz M., and Yeaple S. Exports versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94 1 (2004) 300-317
16. Hillman A.L. Declining industries and political support protectionist motives. American Economic Review 72 5 (1982) 1180-1187
17. Katayama J., Lu S., and Tybout J. Why plant level productivity studies are often misleading and an alternative approach to inference. NBER W° 9617 (2003) 1-43
18. Klette T.J., and Griliches Z. The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobservable and endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 4 (1996) 343-361
19. Konings J., and Vandenbussche H. Anti-dumping protection and market power of domestic firms. Journal of International Economics 65 (2005) 151-165
20. Levinsohn J. Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis. Journal of International Economics 35 (1993) 1-22
21. Liebman B.H. Safeguards, China and the price of steel. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 142 2 (2006) 354-373
22. Lileeva A., and Trefler D. Improved market access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity. NBER paper W13297 (2007) 1-51
23. Mairesse J., and Jaumandreu J. Panel data estimates of the production function and the revenue function: what difference does it make?. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107 (2005) 651-672
24. Melitz M. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 6 (2003) 1695-1725
25. Miyagiwa K., and Ohno Y. Closing the technology gap under protection. American Economic Review (1995) 755-770
26. Niels G. What is antidumping policy really about?. Journal of Economic Surveys 14 (2000) 465-492
27. Olley G., and Pakes A. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64 6 (1996) 1263-1297
28. Pavcnik N. Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: evidence from Chilean plants. Review of Economic Studies 69 1 (2002) 245-276
29. Prusa T. Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?. Journal of International Economics 33 (1992) 1-20
30. Prusa T. The trade effects of US antidumping actions. In: Feenstra R. (Ed). The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies. NBER volume (1997), The University of Chicago Press 191-214
31. Prusa T. On the spread and impact of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics 34 3 (2001) 591-611
32. Rodrik D. Closing the productivity gap: does trade liberalization really help?. In: Helleiner G. (Ed). Trade Policy, Industrialization and Development: New Perspectives (1992), Clarendon Press, Oxford 155-175
33. Shin H.J. Possible instances of predatory pricing in recent US antidumping cases. In: Lawrence R. (Ed). Brookings Trade Forum 1998 (1998), Brookings Institute Press 81-88
34. Trefler D. The long and short of the Canadian-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. American Economic Review 94 4 (2004) 870-895
35. Tybout J., and Westbrook M.D. Trade liberalization and the dimensions of efficiency change in mexican manufacturing industries. Journal of International Economics 39 (1995) 53-78
36. Van Biesebroeck J. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Journal of International Economics 67 2 (2005) 373-391
37. Van Biesebroeck J. Robustness of productivity estimates. Journal of Industrial Economics 55 3 (2007) 529-569
38. Vandenbussche H., and Zanardi M. The Chilling effects of antidumping proliferation. CEPR discussion paper 5597 (2006) 1-38
39. Veugelers R., and Vandenbussche H. European antidumping policy and the profitability of national and international collusion. European Economic Review 43 1 (1999) 1-28