Coordinate noun phrase disambiguation in a generative parsing model

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 680-687

  Hogan, Deirdre ^a,b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASELINE MODELS; COORDINATION DEPENDENCIES; F-SCORE; NOUN PHRASE; REDUCING NOISE; RELATIVE REDUCTION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 55649121495     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Rajeev Agarwal and Lois Boggess. 1992. A Simple but Useful Approach to Conjunct Identification. In Proceedings of the 30th ACL.
2. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz and Robert MacIntyre. 1995. Bracketing Guidelines for Treebank II Style Penn Treebank Project. Technical Report. University of Pennsylvania.
3. Dan Bikel. 2004. On The Parameter Space of Generative Lexicalized Statistical Parsing Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Sharon Caraballo. 1999. Automatic construction of a hypernym-labeled noun hierarchy from text. In Proceedings of the 37th ACL.
5. Eugene Charniak and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarse-to-fine nbest Parsing and MaxEnt Discriminative Reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACL.
6. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Markus Dickinson and W. Detmar Meurers. 2005. Prune diseased branches to get healthy trees! How to find erroneous local trees in a treebank and why it matters. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
8. Amit Dubey, Patrick Sturt and Frank Keller. 2005. Parallelism in Coordination as an Instance of Syntactic Priming: Evidence from Corpus-based Modeling. In Proceedings of the HLT/EMNP-05.
9. Miriam Goldberg. 1999. An Unsupervised Model for Statistically Determining Coordinate Phrase Attachment. In Proceedings of the 27th ACL.
10. Deirdre Hogan. 2005. κ-NN for Local Probability Estimation in Generative Parsing Models. In Proceedings of the IWPT-05.
11. Sadao Kurohashi and Makoto Nagao. 1994. A Syntactic Analysis Method of Long Japanese Sentences Based on the Detection of Conjunctive Structures. In Computational Linguistics, 20(4).
12. Preslav Nakov and Marti Hearst. 2005. Using the Web as an Implicit Training Set: Application to Structural Ambiguity Resolution. In Proceedings of the HLT/EMNLP-05.
13. Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Salim Roukos and R. Todd Ward. 1994. A Maximum Entropy Model for Parsing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
14. Philip Resnik. 1999. Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language. In Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:95-130, 1999.
15. Beatrice Santorini. 1991. Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. Technical Report. University of Pennsylvania.
16. Hinrich Schütze. 1998. AutomaticWord Sense Discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):97-123.
17. Dominic Widdows. 2004. Geometry and Meaning. CSLI Publications, Stanford, USA.
18. Shaojun Zhao and Dekang Lin. 2004. A Nearest-Neighbor Method for Resolving PP-Attachment Ambiguity. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP-04.