Editorial Comment on: Transumbilical Single-Port Surgery: Evolution and Current Status

European Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1029-

  Zigeuner, Richard ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EMBRYONIC NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSUMBILICAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; UMBILICUS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 55649110695     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.010     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Canes D., Desai M.M., Aron M., et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54 (2008) 1020-1030
2. Hemal A.K., Kumar A., Kumar R., Wadhwa P., Seth A., and Gupta N.P. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177 (2007) 862-866
3. Fornara P., Doehn C., Seyfarth M., and Jocham D. Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?. Eur Urol 37 (2000) 241-250
4. Jurczok A., Zacharias M., Wagner S., Hamza A., and Fornara P. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 99 (2007) 1461-1466
5. Touijer K., Eastham J.A., Secin F.P., et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 179 (2008) 1811-1817