Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 175-183

  Gundogan, Fatih C ^a,b   Sobaci, Gungor ^a   Bayraktar, Mehmet Z ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Multifocal electroretinogram; Reproducibility; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORNEA; ELECTRODE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MULTIFOCAL ELECTRORETINOGRAM; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55649108175     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9119-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sutter E, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res 32:433-446
2. Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105-115
3. Otto T, Bach M (1997) Retest variability and diurnal effects in the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 92:311-323
4. Yoshii M, yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:122-127
5. Aoyagi K, Kimura Y, Isono H, Akiyama H, Sugawara T (1998) Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 102:340-347
6. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Ito Y, Tanikawa A (1996) Normal values of retinal response densities in multifocal electroretinogram. Nppon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 100:810-816
7. Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski A, Allgayer R (2000) The effect of time of day and repeat reliability on the fast flicker multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 101:247-255
8. Meigen T, Friedrich A (2002) The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings. Ophthalmologe 99:713-718
9. Seiple W, Clemens CJ, Greenstein VC, Carr RE, Holopigian K (2004) Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields with retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 109:255-272
10. Zhang W, Zhao K (2003) Multifocal electroretinographyin central serous chorio-retinopathy and assessment of the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 106:209-213
11. Parks S, Keating D, Evans AL, Williamson TH, Jay JL, Elliott AT (1996-1997) Comparison of repeatibility of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol 92:281-289
12. Bock M, Andrassi M, Belitsky L, Lorenz B (1999) A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems. Doc Ophthalmol 97:157-178
13. Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77-98
14. Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatibility and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17:530-535
15. Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(5):718-723
16. Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: Comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100(2-3):115-137