Production effects of the European union's single farm payment

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 457-471

  Rude, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649100932     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: 17447976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00141.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AAFC. 2007a. Agriculture Ministers Announce New Programs for Canada's Ag Sector. Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, Toronto, November 17. http://www.agr.gc.ca/cb/index_e.php?s1=n&s2=2007&page=n71117 (accessed September 16, 2008).
2. AAFC. 2007b. Agricultural Policy Framework Programs and Services. Agriculture and Agrifood Canada. http://www.agr.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=prog (accessed September 16, 2008).
3. Abler, D. and D. Blandford. 2005. A Review of Empirical Studies on the Acreage and/or Production Response to US Production Flexibility Contract Payments Under the FAIR Act and Related Payments Under Supplementary Legislation. Paris : OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/15/34997377.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
4. Ackrill, R., A. Kay and W. Morgan. 2008. The Common Agricultural Policy and its reform: The problem of reconciling budget and trade concerns. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (4 393 411.
5. Antón, J. 2006. Modeling production response to 'more decoupled' payments. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Policy 2 (1 109 26.
6. Arfini, F., W. Kleinhanss, B. Kuepker and P. A. Jayet. 2007. Insights from GENEDEC. DG AGRI-dissemination meeting. http://www.grignon.inra.fr/ economie-publique/genedec/publi/insights.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
7. Baffes, J. and H. de Gorter. 2004. Experience with Decoupling Agricultural Support. In Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries, edited by M. A. Akog and J. Beghin, pp. 75 90. Washington DC : World Bank Publications.
8. Balkhausen, O. and M. Banse. 2007. The Impact of Decoupling and Modulation in the European Union: A Sectoral and Farm Level Assessment. Deliverable No. 18 IDEMA Project, University of Göttingen. http://www.sli.lu.se/IDEMA/WPs/IDEMA_deliverable_18_rev.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
9. Balkhausen, O., M. Banse and H. Grethe. 2007. Modelling CAP decoupling in the EU: A comparison of selected simulation models and results. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1 57 71.
10. Benjamin, D. 1992. Household consumption, labour markets, and labour demand: Testing for separation in agricultural farm household models. Econometrica 60 : 287 322.
11. Binfield, J., T. Donnellan, K. Hanranhan, C. Hart and P. Westhoff. 2004. CAP Reform and the WTO: Potential Impacts on EU Agriculture. selected paper AAEA annual meetings, Denver, Colorado. http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/outreach/ publications/2004/FAPRI_UMC_Report_08_04.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
12. Burfisher, M. E. and J. Hopkins (Eds 2004. Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Setting. USDA, Agricultural Economic Report, No. 838, Washington.
13. Cahill, S. 1997. Calculating the rate of decoupling for crops under CAP/oilseeds reform. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48 : 349 78.
14. DEFRA. 2003. Assessment of the economic impact of the commission's long term perspective for sustainable agriculture. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2003, Agricultural Policy and Food Chain Economics Division.
15. de Janvry, A., M. Fafchamps and E. Sadoulet. 1991. Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. Economic Journal 101 : 1400 17.
16. EC. 1992. Council regulation (ECC) No. 1765/92, establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops. Official Journal of the European Communities No. L181 : 12 29.
17. EC. 2003. Council regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003, establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers. Official Journal of the European Union No. L270 : 1 69.
18. European Commission. 2003. Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. A long-term perspective for sustainable agriculture. Impact analysis. Brussels : Directorate-General for Agriculture, European Commission.
19. Gohin, A. and L. Latruffe. 2006. The Luxembourg Common Agricultural Policy and the European food industries: What's at stake Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 24 (1 175 94.
20. Gohin, A., H. Guyomard and C. Le Mouël. 2001. Measures of internal support: The decoupling issue. In Coordinated Studies in View of the Future Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations in Agriculture and the Food Sector. http://w3.rennes.inra.fr/economie/pdf/gogule.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
21. Hennessy, D. 1998. The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 : 46 57.
22. Kelch, D. 1999. EU's Agenda 2000 and Beyond. Agricultural Outlook, USDA-ERS, AGO-265, October : 12 5.
23. Kelch, D. and M. A. Normile. 2004. CAP Reform of 2003-04. WRS-04-07 Economic Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.ers.usda. gov/publications/WRS0407/ (accessed September 16, 2008).
24. Moschini, G. and P. Sckokai. 1994. Efficiently decoupled farm programs under distortionary taxation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 : 362 70.
25. OECD. 2004. Analysis of the 2003 CAP Reform. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/42/32039793.pdf (accessed September 16, 2008).
26. OECD. 2005. Decoupling-Policy Implications. AGR/CA/APM(2005)22/FINAL, Paris : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Working Paper on Agricultural Policies and Markets.
27. Phimister, E. 1995. Farm household production in the presence of restrictions on debt: Theory and policy implications. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46 : 371 80.
28. Rude, J. 2000. An Examination of Nearly Green Programs: Case Studies for Canada, the United States, and the European Union. Publication 2010/E, Ottawa : Trade Research Series, Agriculture and Agrifood Canada.
29. Rude, J. 2001. Under the green box: The WTO and farm subsidies. Journal of World Trade 35 (5 1015 33.
30. Sckokai, P. and J. Antón. 2005. The degree of decoupling of area payments for arable crops in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (5 1220 28.
31. Sckokai, P. and D. Moro. 2006. Modeling the reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy for arable crops under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 (1 43 56.
32. Singh, I., L. Squire and J. Strauss. 1986. An Overview of Agricultural Household Models - The Basic Model: Theory, Empirical Results, and Policy Conclusions. In Agricultural Household Models, Extensions, Applications and Policy, edited by I. Singh, L. Squire, and J. Strauss, pp. 17 47. Baltimore : The World Bank and the Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Swinbank, A. 2008. Potential WTO challenges to the CAP. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (4 445 56.
34. Swinbank, A. and C. Daugbjerg. 2006. The 2003 CAP reform: Accommodating WTO pressures. Comparative European Politics 4 : 47 64.
35. Tranter, R., A. Swinbank, M. Wooldridge, L. Costa, T. Knapp, G. Little and M. Sottomayor. 2007. Implications for food production, land use and rural development of the European Union's Single Farm Payment: Indications from a survey of farmers' intentions in Germany, Portugal and the UK. Food Policy 32 : 656 71.
36. Witzke, H. P. and A. Zintl. 2005. CAPSIM Documentation of Model Structure and Implementation. Eurostat Working Papers and Studies. Luxembourg : Eurostat.