Simulation and experimental validation of a methanol burner

Fuel

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 326-334

  Collazo, J ^a   Porteiro, J ^a   Patino D ^a   Miguez, J L ^a   Granada, E ^a   Moran, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

CFD; Combustion; EDC; Spray formation

Indexed keywords

ATOMIZATION; COMBUSTION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DROP FORMATION; DROPS; DYNAMICS; EXPERIMENTS; FLUID DYNAMICS; FORECASTING; HYDRAULICS; JETS; METHANOL; THERMOCHEMISTRY;

CFD; COMBUSTION MODELS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELS; DROPLET DIAMETERS; DROPLET TRAJECTORIES; EDC; EXPERIMENTAL DATABASES; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; FUEL ATOMIZATIONS; GAS CONCENTRATIONS; LIQUID ATOMIZATIONS; SIMULATED DATUMS; SPECIAL EMPHASES; SPRAY FORMATION;

SMOKE;

EID: 55649088703     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pallarés J., Arauzo I., and Williams A. Integration of CFD codes and advanced combustion models for quantitative burnout determination. Fuel 86 (2007) 2283-2290
2. Vuthaluru R., and Vuthaluru H.B. Modelling of a wall fired furnace for different operating conditions using FLUENT. Fuel Process Technol 87 (2006) 633-639
3. Asotani T., Yamashita T., Tonigata H., Uesugi Y., Itaya Y., and Mori S. Prediction of ignition behavior in a tangentially fired pulverized coal boiler using CFD. Fuel 87 (2008) 482-490
4. Dixon T.F., Mann A.P., Plaza F., and Gilfillan W.N. Development of advanced technology for biomass combustion-CFD as an essential tool. Fuel 84 (2005) 1303-1311
5. Šarlej M., Petr P., Hájek J., and Stehlík P. Computational support in experimental burner design optimisation. Appl Therm Eng 27 (2007) 2727-2731
6. Oberkampf W.L., and Trucano T.G. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38 (2002) 209-272
7. Presser C., Gupta A.K., and Semerjian H.G. Aerodynamic characteristics of swirling spray flames: pressure-jet atomizer. Combust Flame 92 (1993) 25-44
8. Stopford P.J. Recent applications of CFD modeling in the power generation and combustion industries. Appl Math Model 26 (2002) 351-374
9. Widmann J.F., and Presser C. A benchmark experimental database for multiphase combustion model input and validation. Combust Flame 129 (2002) 47-86
10. Wing T. Chemical kinetic data base for combustion chemistry. Part 2. methanol. J Phys Chem Ref Data 16 3 (1987) 471-508
11. Blokh A.G. Heat transfer in steam boiler furnaces. 1st ed. (1988), Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, United States of America
12. Fluent, Inc. FLUENT user's guide. Version 6.3; 2006.
13. McKenty F., Gravel L., and Camarero R. Numerical simulation of industrial boilers. Korean J Chem Eng 16 4 (1999) 482-488
14. Saario A., Rebola A., Coelho P.J., Costa M., and Oksanen A. Heavy fuel oil combustion in a cylindrical laboratory furnace measurements and modeling. Fuel 84 (2005) 359-369
15. Madsen J. Computational and experimental study of sprays from the breakup of water sheets. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2006.
16. Senecal P.K., Schmidt D.P., Nouar I., Rutland C.J., Reitz R.D., and Corradini M.L. Modeling high-speed viscous liquid sheet atomization. Int J Multiphas Flow 25 (1999) 1073-1097
17. Chacon J., Sala J.M., and Blanco J.M. Investigation on the design and optimization of a low NOx-CO emission burner both experimentally and through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Energ Fuel 21 (2007) 42-58
18. Zarnescu V., and Pisupati S.V. An integrative approach for combustor design using CFD methods. Energ Fuel 16 (2002) 622-633
19. Takei M., Weber R., and Niioka T. Mathematical modeling of industrial furnaces considering detailed oil spray characteristics. Combust Sci Technol 175 (2003) 1237-1262
20. Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH. On mathematical models of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. In: 16th Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, 1976.
21. Porteiro J, Miguez JL, Granada E, Moran JC, Lamilla F. Dynamic modelling of a biomass fixed bed combustion system. In: Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Pellets, Jönköping, Sweden, May-June; 2006.
22. Yin C., Rosendahl L., Kær S.K., Clausen S., Hvid S.L., and Hille T. Mathematical modeling and experimental study of biomass combustion in a thermal 108 MW grate-fired boiler. Energy Fuels 22 (2008) 1380-1390
23. Gonçalves dos Santos R., Lecanu M., Ducruix S., Gicquel O., Iacona E., and Veynante D. Coupled large eddy simulations of turbulent combustion and radiative heat transfer. Combust Flame 152 (2008) 387-400
24. Watanabe H., Kurose R., Komori S., and Pitsch H. Effects of radiation on spray flame characteristics and soot formation. Combust Flame 152 (2008) 2-13
25. Patel N., and Menon S. Simulation of spray-turbulence-flame interactions in a lean direct injection combustor. Combust Flame 153 (2008) 228-257
26. Veynante D., and Vervisch L. Turbulent combustion modeling. Prog Energ Combust 28 (2002) 193-266
27. Magnussen BF. On the structure of turbulence and a generalized eddy dissipation concept for chemical reaction in turbulent flow. 19th AIAA Meeting, St. Louis; 1981.
28. Borman G.L., and Ragland K.W. Combustion engineering (1998), McGraw-Hill, United States of America
29. Selçuk N., and Kayacol N. Evaluation of discrete ordinates method for radiative transfer in rectangular furnaces. Int J Heat Mass Tran 40 2 (1997) 213-222
30. Widmann JF, Charagundla SR, Presser C. Benchmark experimental database for multiphase combustion model input and validation: baseline case. Progress Report NISTIR 6286. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg; 2001.
31. Watanabe H., Suwa Y., Matsushita Y., Morozumi Y., Aoki H., Tanno S., and Miura T. Spray combustion simulation including soot and NO formation. Energ Convers Manage 48 (2007) 2077-2089
32. Kim J.P., Schnell U., and Scheffknecht G. Comparison of different global reaction mechanisms for mild combustion of natural gas. Combust Sci Technol 180 (2008) 565-592