Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population

ORL

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 366-372

  Chien, Chih Hung ^a,b   Tu, Tzong Yang ^a,b   Shiao, An Suey ^a,b   Chien, Shu Feng ^a   Wang, Yi Fen ^a,b   Li, Angela Chung I ^a   Yang, Mei Jan ^a  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem responses; Auditory threshold; Geriatrics; Pure tone audiometry; Speech reception threshold test

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GERIATRIC CARE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COHORT STUDIES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 55549133618     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000163032     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Carhart R: Observations on relations between thresholds for pure tones and for speech. J Speech Hear Disord 1971; 36: 476-483.
2. Ventry IM: Pure tone-spondee threshold relationships in functional hearing loss: a hypothesis. J Speech Hear Disord 1976; 41: 16-22.
3. Picard M, Banville R, Barbarosie T, Manolache M: Speech audiometry in noise-exposed workers: the SRT-PTA relationship revisited. Audiology 1999; 38: 30-43.
4. American Medical Association: Council on physical medicine tentative standard procedure for evaluating the percentage of hearing in medicolegal cases. JAMA 1947; 133: 396-397.
5. American Speech and Hearing Association: Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA 1988; 30: 85-89.
6. British Society of Audiology: BAOL/BSA method for assessment of hearing disability. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 203-212.
7. Epstein A: Speech audiometry. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 667-676.
8. Jerger J, Johnson K, Jerger S: Effect of response criterion on measures of speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 49-56.
9. Stach BA: Clinical Audiology: An introduction. London, Singular Publishing, 1998.
10. Burkard RF, Sims D: The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. Am J Audiol 2001; 10: 53-61.
11. Rowe MJ 3rd: Normal variability of the brainstem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 44: 459-470.
12. Chu NS: Age-related latency changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 431-436.
13. Costa P, Benna P, Bianco C, Ferrero P, Bergamasco B: Aging effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 30: 495-500.
14. Hyde M, Alberti P, Matsumoto N, Li YL: Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 514-519.
15. Prasher D, Mula M, Luxon L: Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: a comparison of noise induced hearing loss with Ménière's disease. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107: 780-786.
16. Sohmer H, Feinmesser M, Bauberger-Tell L, Edelstein E: Cochlear, brain stem, and cortical evoked responses in nonorganic hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 86: 227-234.
17. Coats AC, Martin JL: Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses: effects of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605-622.
18. Jerger J, Mauldin L: Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 456-461.
19. Gorga MP, Worthington DW, Reiland JK, Beauchaine KA, Goldgar DE: Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 105-112.
20. van der Drift JF, Brocaar MP, van Zanten GA: The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1987; 26: 1-10.
21. Soucek S, Michaels L, Frohlich A: Evidence for hair cell degeneration as the primary lesion in hearing loss of the elderly. J Otolaryngol 1986; 15: 175-183.
22. Bellman S, Barnard S, Beagley HA: A nineyear review of 841 children tested by transtympanic electrocochleography. J Laryngol Otol 1984; 98: 1-9.
23. Yoshioka P, Thornton AR: Predicting speech discrimination from the audiometric thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 814-827.
24. Jerger J, Jerger S, Pirozzolo F: Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 103-109.
25. Soucek S, Mason SM: A study of hearing in the elderly using non-invasive electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 345-353.
26. Oku T, Hasegewa M: The influence of aging on auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography in the elderly. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1997; 59: 141-146.
27. Nozawa I, Imamura S, Fujimori I, Hashimoto K, Shimomura S, Hisamatsu K, Murakami Y: Age-related alterations in the auditory brainstem responses and the compound action potentials in guinea pigs. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1034-1039.
28. Proctor TB, Velde TM, Dayal VS, Bhattacharyya TK, Artwohl J, Towle VL: Auditory brain stem response in young and old guinea pigs. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 226-229.
29. Ingham NJ, Thornton SK, Comis SD, Withington DJ: The auditory brainstem response of aged guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118: 673-680.