Validation of the risk and resiliency assessment tool for juveniles in the Los Angeles County probation system

Federal Probation

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Turner, Susan ^a   Fain, Terry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549125666     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Jones, D., Johnson, S., Latessa, E., & Travis, L. F. (1999). Case classification in community corrections: Preliminary findings from a national survey in New York state. In LIS, Inc., National Institutes of Corrections, Topics in community corrections, pp. 4-10.
3. Little, J. (n. d.). An evaluation of the San Diego risk and resiliency check up. Boulder, CO: Social Science Data Analysis Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
4. Multi-Health Systems Inc. (1998). The Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI): Research Version. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
5. Solomon, L. & Camp, A. T. (1993). The revolution in correctional classification. In American Correctional Association (Ed.), Classification: A tool for managing today's offenders. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
6. Turner, S., & Fain, T. (2003). Validation of the Los Angeles County Probation Department's risk and needs assessment instruments. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation.
7. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Assessing risk for reofense: Validating the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.