Double-Length Regression tests for testing functional forms and spatial error dependence

Economics Letters

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 253-257

  Le, Canh Quang ^a   Li, Dong ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Box Cox; Double Length Regression; Spatial error dependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549116660     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.08.023     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (1988), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
2. Anselin L., and Rey S. Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis 23 (1991) 112-131
3. Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R., and Yoon M.J. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1996) 77-104
4. Bailly A.S., Coffey W.J., Paelinck J.H.P., and Polese M. The Spatial Econometrics of Services (1992), Avebury, Aldershot, UK
5. Baltagi B.H., and Li D. Double-length regressions for the Box-Cox difference model with heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation. Economics Letters 69 (2000) 9-14
6. Baltagi B.H., and Li D. LM tests for functional form and spatial error correlation. International Regional Science Review 24 2 (2001) 194-225
7. Baltagi B.H., and Li D. Double length artificial regressions for testing spatial dependence. Econometric Reviews 20 1 (2001) 31-40
8. Box G.E.P., and Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 26 (1964) 211-252
9. Boxall P.C., Chan W.H., and McMillan M.L. The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values: a spatial hedonic analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 27 3 (2005) 248-269
10. Davidson R., and MacKinnon J.G. Model specification tests based on artificial linear regressions. International Economic Review 25 (1984) 485-502
11. Davidson R., and MacKinnon J.G. Testing linear and loglinear regressions against Box-Cox alternatives. Canadian Journal of Economics 18 (1985) 499-517
12. Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J.G. 1987, Double length artificial regressions, Queen's Economics Department Working Paper No 169.
13. Davidson R., and MacKinnon J.G. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
14. Ertur C., Le Gallo J., and Baumont C. The European regional convergence process, 1980-1995: do spatial regimes and spatial dependence matter?. International Regional Science Review 29 1 (2006) 3-34
15. Fik T.J., and Mulligan G.F. Functional form and spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A 30 (1998) 1497-1507
16. Florax R., and Folmer H. Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models: Monte Carlo evaluation of pre-test estimators. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (1992) 405-432
17. Griffith D.A., Paelinck J.H.P., and van Gastel R.A. The Box-Cox transformation: computational and interpretation features of the parameters. In: Griffith D.A., et al. (Ed). Econometric Advances in Spatial Modelling and Methodology: Essays in Honour of Jean Paelinck (1998), Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
18. Lacombe D.J., and Shaughnessy T.M. Accounting for spatial error correlation in the 2004 presidential popular vote. Public Finance Review 35 4 (2007) 480-499
19. Longhi S., and Nijkamp P. Forecasting regional labor market developments under spatial autocorrelation. International Regional Science Review 30 2 (2007) 100-119
20. Ord J.K. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. Journal of American Statistical Association 70 (1975) 120-126
21. Upton G.J.G., and Fingleton B. Spatial Data Analysis by Example (1985), Wiley, Chichester, UK