Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability

International Journal of Biostatistics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Van Der Laan, Mark J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical gradient; Case control sampling; Causal effect; Counterfactual; Double robust estimation; Efficient influence curve; Estimating function; Gradient; Incidence density sampling; Influence curve; Inverse probability of treatment weighting

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; BIOSTATISTICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOSTATISTICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREVALENCE; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAMPLING STUDIES;

EID: 55549113229     PISSN: 15574679     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1114     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. J.A. Anderson. Separate sample logistic discrimination. Biometrika, 59:19-35, 1972.
2. J. Benichou and S. Wacholder. A comparison of three approaches to estimate exposure-specific incidence rates from population-based case-control data. Statistics in Medicine, 13:651-661, 1994.
3. P.J. Bickel, C.A. J. Klaassen, Y. Ritov, and J.A. Wellner. Efficient and adaptive estimation for semiparametric models. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1993. ISBN 0-8018-4541-6.
4. N.E. Breslow. Statistics in epidemiology: the case-control study. J Am Stat Soc, 91:14-28, 1996.
5. N.E. Breslow and N.E. Day. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume 1 - The analysis of case-control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1980.
6. N.E. Breslow, N.E. Day, K.T. Halvorsen, R.L. Prentice, and C. Sabal. Estimation of multiple relative risk functions in matched case-control studies. Am J Epid, 108(4):299-307, 1978.
7. N.E. Breslow, J.M. Robins, and J.A. Wellner. On the semi-parametric efficiency of logistic regression under case-control sampling. Bernoulli, 6(3):447-455, 2000.
8. D. Collett. Modeling Binary Data. Chapman and Hall, London, 1991.
9. J. Cornfield. A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data. applications to cancer of the lung, breast, and cervix. J Nat Cancer Inst, 11:1269-1275, 1951.
10. J. Cornfield. A statistical problem arising from retrospective studies. In J. Neyman, editor, Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium, Volume IV, pages 133-148. University of California Press, 1956.
11. S.R. Cosslett. Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples. Econometrica, 49(5):1289-1316, 1981.
12. S. Greenland. Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol, 160(4):301-305, 2004.
13. S. Greenland. Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studies. J Chron Dis, 34:445-453, 1981.
14. T.R. Holford, C. White, and J.L. Kelsey. Multivariate analysis for matched case-control studies. Am J Epid, 107(3):245-255, 1978.
15. D.W. Hosmer and S. Lemeshow. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2nd edition, 2000.
16. N.P. Jewell. Statistics for Epidemiology. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2004.
17. C.F. Manski and S.R. Lerman. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica, 45(8):1977-1988, 1977.
18. C.F. Manski and D. McFadden. Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis. In C.F. Manski and D. McFadden, editors, Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.
19. R. Mansson, M.M. Joffe, W. Sun, and S. Hennessy. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 00:1-8, 2007.
20. K.L. Moore and M.J. van der Laan. Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes. Technical report 215, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, April 2007.
21. A.P. Morise, G.A. Diamon, R. Detrano, M. Bobbio, and Erdogan Gunel. The effect of disease-prevalence adjustments on the accuracy of a logistic prediction model. Med Decis Making, 16:133-142, 1996.
22. S. Newman. Causal analysis of case-control data. Epid Persp Innov, 3:2, 2006. URL http://www.epi-perspectives.com/content/3/1/2.
23. R.L. Prentice and N.E. Breslow. Retrospective studies and failure time models. Biometrika, 65(1):153-158, 1978.
24. R.L. Prentice and R. Pyke. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika, 66:403-411, 1979.
25. J.M. Robins. [choice as an alternative to control in observational studies]: Comment. Statistical Science, 14(3):281-293, 1999.
26. J.M. Robins, A. Rotnitzky, and L.P. Zhao. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427):846-866, September 1994.
27. K. Rothman and S. Greenland. Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2nd edition, 1998.
28. D.B. Rubin. Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
29. J.J. Schlesselman. Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982.
30. M.J. van der Laan. Causal effect models for intention to treat and realistic individualized treatment rules. Technical report 203, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
31. M.J. van der Laan and J.M. Robins. Unified methods for censored longitudinal data and causality. Springer, New York, 2002.
32. M.J. van der Laan and D. Rubin. Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2(1), 2006.
33. S. Wachholder. The case-control study as data missing by design: Estimating risk differences. Epidemiology, 7(2):144-150, 1996.