Moral-psychological development related to the capacity of adolescents and elderly patients to consent

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 602-605

  Raymundo, M M ^a,b,c   Goldim, J R ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; COMPREHENSION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MIDDLE AGED; MORALITY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; BRAZIL; COMPREHENSION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORAL DEVELOPMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 55549096410     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.022111     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cardozo B. Dissenting opinion in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital. 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92. 1914.
2. Poland SM. Landmark legal cases in bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1997;7:193-4.
3. Anon. Nuremberg Code. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/ nuremberg.html (accessed 13 May 2008).
4. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, latest revision by the WMA General Assembly, Tokyo 2004]. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed 13 May 2008).
5. Neves MCP. Contexto cultural e consentimento: uma perspectiva antropológica. In: Garrafa V, Pessini L, eds. Bioética: poder e injustiça. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003:487-98.
6. Goldim JR. O consentimento informado e a adequação de seu uso na pesquisa em seres humanos [doctoral thesis]. Porto Alegre: PPG em Medicina: Clínica Médica/UFRGS, 1999.
7. Matte U, Goldim JR. Pesquisa em saúde: aspectos éticos e metodológicos envolvidos na avaliação de projetos de pesquisa. Revista HCPA 1995;15:135.
8. Raymundo MM, Matte U, Goldim JR. Consentimento informado e avaliação de projetos de pesquisa no período de 1996 a 1997. Revista HCPA 1998;18(Suppl):30-1.
9. Viegas MAV. O processo de consentimento informado em estudos clínicos em oncologia: percepções dos pacientes [master's thesis]. Porto Alegre: Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia/PUCRS, 1998.
10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
11. Cocking D, Oakley J. Medical experimentation, informed consent and using people. Bioethics 1994;8:293-311.
12. Erlen J. Informed consent: the information component. Orthop Nurs 1994;13:75-8.
13. Erlen J. Informed consent: the consent component. Orthop Nurs 1994;13:65-7.
14. Lo B, Feigal D, Cummings S, et al. Addressing ethical issues: designing clinical research. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1988:151-8.
15. Kirby M. Consent and the doctor-patient relationship. In: Gillon R, ed. Principles of health care ethics. London: Wiley, 1994:445-56.
16. Dunn L, Nowrangi M, Palmer B, et al. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1323-34.
17. Piaget J. Le jugement moral chez l'enfant. Paris: PUF, 1973.
18. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development. Vol I. The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. New York: Harper & Row, 1981.
19. Loevinger J, Wessler R. Measuring ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1970.
20. Turiel E, Hildebrandt C, Wainryb C. Judging social issues: difficulties, inconsistencies and consistencies. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1991;56:1-87.
21. Biagio AMB. Introdução à teoria de julgamento moral de Kohlberg. In: Nunes M, ed. Moral e TV. Porto Alegre: Evangraf, 1998:29-63.
22. Freitas LBL. Piaget e a consciência moral: um kantismo evolutivo? Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 2002;15:303-8.
23. Souza ELP. Pesquisa sobre as fases evolutivas do ego. Boletim da SPRGS 1968;3:5-16.
24. Carmona J, Pedrazani AA, Santos S, et al. Validação de um instrumento para avaliar autonomia: alterações de forma. Revista HCPA 1996;16:128.
25. Glock RS, Goldim JR. O proceso de consentimento informado em pesquisas com idosos. R Med PUCRS 2003;13:14-20.
26. Santos M, Eccel C, Menezes C, et al. Componente de consentimento: validação temporal de um instrumento para avaliar autonomia. Revista HCPA 1996;16:129.
27. Kanner S, Langerman S, Grey M. Ethical considerations for a child's participation in research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2004;9:15-23.
28. Ahronheim JC, Moreno S, Zuckerman C. Ethics in clinical practice. Boston: Little Brown, 1994.
29. Wong JG, Clare CH, Gunn MJ, et al. Capacity to make health care decisions: its importance in clinical practice. Psychol Med 1999;29:437-46.
30. Pithan LH, Bernardes FB, Pires-Filho LABS. Capacidade decisória do paciente: aspectos jurídicos e bioéticos. In: Gauer GJC, Ávila GA, Ávila GN, eds. Ciclo de conferências em bioética. 1st edn. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2005:121-37.
31. Freitas L. A moral na obra de Jean Piaget: um projeto inacabado. São Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2003.