Influence of patient characteristics on success of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Pharmacotherapy

Volumn 28, Issue 11 PART 1, 2008, Pages 1341-1347

  Fravel, Michelle A ^a,b   Ernst, Michael E ^b,c   Weber, Cynthia A ^b   Dawson, Jeffrey D ^b   Carter, Barry L ^b,c   Bergus, George R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

ABPM; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; BMI; Body mass index; Diabetes mellitus; Kidney diseases

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BODY MASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FAMILY CENTERED CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCUPATION; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; BODY MASS INDEX; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55549095639     PISSN: 02770008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1592/phco.28.11.1341     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. JAMA 2003;289:2560-72.
2. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997;278:1065-72.
3. Ernst ME, Bergus GR. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: technology with a purpose. Am Fam Physician 2003;67: 2262-3.
4. Ernst ME, Bergus GR. Favorable patient acceptance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a primary care setting in the United States: a cross-sectional survey [online exclusive article]. BMC Fam Prac 2003;4:15. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/4/15.
5. Ernst ME, Weber CA, Dawson JE, et al. How well does a shortened time interval characterize results of a full ambulatory blood pressure monitoring session? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008;10:431-5.
6. Ernst ME, Bergus GR. Noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: overview of technology and clinical applications. Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:597-612.
7. Pickering TG, Shimbo D, Haas D. Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2368-74.
8. Moser M. Hypertension can be treated effectively without increasing the cost of care. J Hum Hypertens 1996;10(suppl 2):533-8.
9. Rodriguez-Roca GC. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the follow-up of hypertension. Blood Press 2006;15:27-36.
10. White WB, Berson AS, Robb ins C, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressure with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993;21:504-9.
11. Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA 1999;282:539-46.
12. Brymora A, Flisinski M, Grzesk G, Szadujkis-Szadurski L, Odrowaz-Sypniewska G, Manitius J. Inflammation, malnutrition and vascular contraction in experimental chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol 2007;20:423-9.
13. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, et al. British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990;8:607-19.
14. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard: electronic or automated sphygmomanometers, ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 2003.