Assessing preference in elders with dementia using multimedia and verbal pleasant events schedules

Behavioral Interventions

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 213-225

  LeBlanc, Linda A ^a   Raetz, Paige B ^a   Baker, Jonathan C ^a   Strobel, Margaret J ^b   Feeney, Brian J ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549092081     PISSN: 10720847     EISSN: 1099078X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bin.266     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 1-4.
2. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533.
3. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25.
4. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
5. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
6. Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 668-677.
7. LeBlanc, L. A., Cherup, S. M., Feliciano, L., & Sidner, T. M. (2006). Using choice-making opportunities to increase activity engagement in individuals with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementia, 21, 318-325.
8. Lewinsohn, P. M., & Graf, M. (1973). Pleasant activities and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 261-268.
9. Logsdon, R. G., & Teri, L. (1997). The pleasant events schedule - AD: Psychometric properties and relationship to depression and cognition in Alzheimer's disease patients. The Gerontologist, 37, 40-45.
10. Mace, N. L. (1987). Principles of activities for persons with dementia. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 5, 13-27.
11. MacPhillamy, D. J., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1982). The pleasant events schedule: Studies on reliability, validity, and scale intercorrelation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 363-380.
12. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
13. Staal, J. A., Pickney, L., & Roane, D. M. (2003). Assessment of stimulus preferences in multisensory environment therapy for older people with dementia. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 542-550.
14. Teri, L., & Lewinsohn, P. (1982). Modification of the pleasant and unpleasant events schedules for use with the elderly. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 444-445.
15. Teri, L., & Logsdon, R. G. (1991). Identifying pleasant activities for Alzheimer's disease patients: The pleasant events schedule - AD. The Gerontologist, 31, 124-127.