Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 813-819

  Odibo, Anthony O ^a   Dicke, Jeffrey M ^a   Gray, Diana L ^a   Oberle, Barbara ^a   Stamilio, David M ^a   MacOnes, George A ^a   Crane, James P ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BLEEDING; CHORION VILLUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS WASTAGE; GESTATION PERIOD; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; NEEDLE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; ECHOGRAPHY; PREGNANCY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TIME;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 55449137380     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181875b92     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97 suppl:1-12.
2. Wapner RJ. Invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques. Semin Perinatol 2005;29:401-4.
3. Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: recommendations for prenatal counseling. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 1995;44:1-12.
4. Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:687-94.
5. Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselman SE, de la Cruz FF, Desnick RJ, Golbus MS, et al. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cyto-genetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1989;320:609-17.
6. Jackson LG, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, Desnick RJ, Golbus MS, Ledbetter DH, et al. A randomized comparison of transcervi-cal and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;327:594-8.
7. Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:612-6.
8. Brambati B, Tului L, Camurri L, Guercilena S. Early second trimester (13 to 20 weeks) transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS): a safe and alternative method for both high and low risk populations. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:907-13.
9. Sundberg K, Bang J, Smidt-Jensen S, Brocks V, Lundsteen C, Parner J, et al. Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1997;350:697-703.
10. Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T, Robertson R, Anderson J, McLennan A, et al. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:55-8.
11. Lau KT, Leung YT, Fung YT, Chan LW, Sahota DS, Leung NT. Outcome of 1,355 consecutive transabdominal chorionic villus samplings in 1,351 patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005;118: 1675-81.
12. Papp C, Beke A, Mezei G, Tó th-Pál E, Papp Z. Chorionic villus sampling: a 15-year experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002;17: 218-27.
13. Brun JL, Mangione R, Gangbo F, Guyon F, Taine L, Roux D, et al. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:295-301.
14. Chueh JT, Goldberg JD, Wohlferd MM, Golbus MS. Comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling loss rates in nine thousand cases from a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1277-82.
15. Cederholm M, Axelsson O. A prospective comparative study on transabdominal chorionic villus sampling and amniocente-sis performed at 10-13 week's gestation. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:311-7.
16. Nicolaides KH, Brizot ML, Patel F, Snjders R. Comparison of chorion villus sampling and early amniocentesis for karyotyp-ing in 1,492 singleton pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996;11: 9-15.
17. Brambati B, Terzian E, Tognoni G. Randomized clinical trial of transabdominal versus transcervical chorionic villus sampling methods. Prenat Diagn 1991;11:285-93.
18. Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J, Lundsteen C, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, et al. Randomized comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1992;340:1237-44.
19. Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:589-95.
20. Silver RK, MacGregor SN, Muhlbach LH, Kambich MP, Ragin A. A comparison of pregnancy loss between transcervi-cal and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:657-60.
21. Firth HV, Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, MacKenzie IZ, Lindenbaum RH, Huson SM. Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 56-66 days' gestation. Lancet 1991;337:762-3.