Erratum: Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service: Implications for policy (Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly(2008) 37:4 (581-602) DOI: 10.1177/0899764007312666);Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations: Implications for policy

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 581-602

  Schmid, Hillel ^a   Bar, Michal ^a   Nirel, Ronit ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Accessibility to policy makers; Key figures at the national and local authority levels; Perceived political influence; Political and advocacy activity; Setting the public agenda

Indexed keywords

EID: 55449132248     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764008330174     Document Type: Erratum

References (66)

1. Aldrich, H.E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 79-105.
2. Aldrich, H.E., & Reuf, M. (2006). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Andrews, K.T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479-506.
4. Aviram, U., Admon, S., Eisenstadt, M., & Kanter, A. (2000). Megamot shinui veshimur behakika bethum bri'ut hanefesh beyisrael: Tahalikh hakikato shel hahok hahadash letipul beholei nefesh [Change and preservation in mental health legislation in Israel: The legislative process of Israel's new mental health law]. Mishpatim, 31, 145-193.
5. Barker-Plummer, B. (2002). Producing public voice: Resource mobilization and media access in the National Organization for Women. Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 188-205.
6. Baumgartner, F.R., & Leech, B.L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Boris, E., & Krehely, J. (2003). Civic participation and advocacy. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 299-330). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Boris, E.T., & Mosher-Williams, R. (1998). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classifications, and data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 488-506.
9. Boris, E., & Steuerle, E. (Eds.). (1999). Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10. Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits' political activity ? American Sociological Review, 69, 292-316.
11. D'Aunno, T., Sutton, R., & Price, R. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 636-661.
12. Davis-Smith, J., & Hedley, R. (1993). Volunteering and the contract culture. Berkhamsted, UK: Volunteer Centre.
13. Deakin, N. (1996). What does contracting do to users? In D. Billis & M. Harris (Eds.), Voluntary agencies: Challenges of organization and management (pp. 113-129). Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.
14. DeVita, C.J. (1999). Nonprofits and devolution: What do we know? In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofit and government (pp. 213-234). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
15. DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
16. Edelman, L., & Suchman, M.C. (1997). The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 479-515.
17. Eisenberg, P. (2005). The truth behind nonprofit advocacy: Rich tips. Denver, CO: Richard Male & Associates.
18. Ethiraj, S.K., & Levinthal, D. (2004). Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 404-437.
19. Ezell, M. (2001). Advocacy in the human services. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
20. Freeman, J.H., Carrol, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692-710.
21. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-205.
22. Frumkin, P. (2002). Service contracting with nonprofit and for-profit providers. In J. Donahue & J. S. Nye Jr. (Eds.), Market-based governance (pp. 67-87). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23. Gidron, B., Katz, H., & Bar, M. (2000). The third sector in Israel 2000: Roles of the sector. Beersheva, Israel: Ben Gurion University of the Negev, The Israeli Center for Third Sector Research.
24. Gronbjerg, K.A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Gronbjerg, K.A., & Smith, S.R. (1999). Nonprofit organizations and public policies in the delivery of human services. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 139-171). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Hasenfeld, Y., & Schmid, H. (1989). The life cycle of human services: An administrative perspective. Administration in Social Work, 13, 243-269.
27. Hoefer, R. (2000). Human services interest groups in four states: Lessons for effective advocacy. Journal of Community Practice, 7 (4). 77-94.
28. Hoyes, I., & Means, R. (1991). Implementing the white paper in community care. Bristol, UK: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
29. Imig, D.R. (1999). Resources mobilization and survival tactics of poverty advocacy groups. The Western Political Quarterly, 45, 501-520.
30. Jenkins, J.C. (1987). Nonprofit organization and policy advocacy. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 296-318). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
32. Korazim-Körösy, Y., Lebovitz, S., & Schmid, H. (2005). The partial privatization of foster care services: Issues and lessons after four years of implementation. Social Security, 70, 56-76.
33. Kramer, R.M. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34. McCarthy, J.D., & Castelli, J. (2002). The necessity for studying organizational advocacy comparatively. In P. Flynn & V. A. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 103-121). New York: Plenum.
35. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
36. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71-98). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37. Meyer, J.W., Scott, W.R., Strang, D., & Creighton, A. (1988). Bureaucratization without centralization: Changes in the organizational system of U.S. public education, 1940-1980. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 139-168). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
38. Mosley, E. (2006). The policy advocacy of human service nonprofits: How institutional processes and environmental conditions shape advocacy involvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
39. Netting, E.F. (1982). Secular and religious funding of church-related agencies. Social Service Review, 56, 586-604.
40. Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resources based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 687-713.
41. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
42. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
43. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (2 nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Piven, F.F., & Cloward, R.A. (1977). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.
45. Rees, S. (2000). Effective advocacy on limited resources. In E. Reid & M. Montilla (Eds.), Exploring organizations and advocacy (pp. 9-16). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
46. Reid, E.J. (1999). Nonprofit advocacy and political participation. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government (pp. 291-308). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
47. Reid, E.J. (2000). Understanding the word "advocacy": Context and use. In E. J. Reid (Ed.), Structuring the inquiry into advocacy: Nonprofit advocacy and the policy process, a seminar series (pp. 1-8). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
48. Salamon, L.M. (1995 a, March). Explaining nonprofit advocacy: An exploratory analysis. Paper presented at the Independent Sector Spring Research Forum, Alexandria, Virginia.
49. Salamon, L.M. (1995 b). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
50. Schmid, H. (2001). Evaluating the impact of legal change on nonprofit and for profit organizations: The case of the Israeli long-term care insurance law. Public Management Review, 3, 167-189.
51. Schmid, H. (2003). Rethinking the policy of contracting out social services to nongovernmental organizations: Lessons and dilemmas. Public Management Review, 5, 307-323.
52. Schmid, H., Bargal, D., Korazim, Y., Straus, E., & Hochstedt, M. (2001). Voluntary nonprofit human service organizations delivering services to children and adolescents: Areas of activity and structure. Jerusalem: The Graduate Program in the Management of Voluntary Nonprofit Organizations, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
53. Schoff, R., & Stevenson, D.R. (1998). The national taxonomy of exempt entities manual. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
54. Scott, W.R. (1994). Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism (pp. 81-99). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Sherer, P.D., & Lee, K. (2002). Institutional change and legal law firms: A resource dependence and institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 102-119.
56. Sine, W.D., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D.A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121-132.
57. Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Sosin, M. (1986). Private benefits: Material assistance in the private sector. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
59. Stone, M.M. (1996). Competing contexts: The evolution of a nonprofit organization's governance system in multiple environments. Administration and Society, 28, 61-89.
60. Sutton, J., Dobbin, F., Meyer, J.W., & Scott, W.R. (1994). The legislation of the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 944-971.
61. Taylor, M., Craig, G., & Wilkinson, M. (2002). Co-option or empowerment? The changing relationship between the state and the voluntary and community sectors. Local Governance, 28, 1-11.
62. Tolbert, P.M., & Zucker, L.G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Tucker, D.J., Baum, J.A., & Singh, J.V. (1992). The institutional ecology of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 47-72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Weisberg, S. (1980). Applied linear regression. New York: Wiley.
65. Yishai, Y. (1990). State and welfare groups: Competition or cooperation? Some observations on the Israeli scene. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 215-235.
66. Yishai, Y. (2003). Bein giyus lepiyus: Hahevra ha'ezrahit beyisrael [Civil society in Israel: Between mobilization and conciliation]. Jerusalem: Carmel Press.