Individual and community in early heidegger: Situating das man, the man-self, and self-ownership in dasein's ontological structure

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 63-99

  Boedeker, Edgar C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55449126456     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017401300076018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, 16th ed. (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1986).
2. Heidegger and the Philosophy of Mind (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), pp. 144-50.
3. Hubert L. Dreyfus’s criticism of Olafson’s interpretation in Being-in-the-World (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991), pp. 141-62.
4. Olafson’s implicit response to Dreyfus in What is a Human Being?: A Heideggerian View (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 6.
5. ‘Heidegger a la Wittgenstein or ‘Coping’ with Professor Dreyfus’, Inquiry 37 (1994), pp. 45-64.
6. Taylor Carman’s expansion and defense of Dreyfus’s position in ‘On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson’, Inquiry 37 (1994), pp. 203-23.
7. Olafson’s criticism of Carman’s interpretation of Dasein as das Man in ‘Individualism, Subjectivity, and Presence: A Response to Taylor Carman’, Inquiry 37 (1994), pp. 331-7.
8. Dreyfus’s own defense of his position against Olafson’s criticism in ‘Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man’, Inquiry 38 (1995), pp. 423-30.
9. Olafson’s counter-attack against Dreyfus in Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of ‘Mitsein’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 26, 35-39.
10. Pierre Keller and David Weberman, ‘Heidegger and the Source(s) of Intelligibility’, Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1998), pp. 369-86.
11. Heidegger's Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 26-28, 346-74).
12. ‘Heidegger and Ethics’, Inquiry 42 (1999), pp. 429-74.
13. Charles Guignon, ‘Heidegger’s ‘Authenticity’ Revisited’, Review of Metaphysics 38 (1984), pp. 321-39.
14. ‘Der Wille zür Macht als Erkenntnis’ (Nietzsche I: Pfüllingen: Neske, 1961), pp. 574, 624.
15. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Band I, 2. Auflage (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1922), pp. 164 f., 293.
16. Erfahrung und Urteil (Hamburg: Meiner, 1985), pp. 27-30.
17. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis (Husserliana, Band XI), ed. Margot Fleischer (Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1966), pp. 6-12, 51-67, 202, 261.
18. Erste Philosophie (1923/24), Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phanomenologischen Reduktion (Husserliana, Band VIII), ed. Rudolf Boehm (Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1959), pp. 146-52.
19. Cartesianische Meditationen (Hamburg: Meiner, 1987), pp. 24, 45-47, 62 f.
20. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), pp. 149, 162, 168.
21. Dreyfus, Being-in-the-World, pp. 94-96.
22. William Blattner, Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 83-85.
23. Thomas Sheehan, ‘Martin Heidegger’, in Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Roütledge, 1998), vol. 4, pp. 311 f.
24. Jean-Paul Sartre, The Transcendence of the Ego: An Existentialist Theory of Consciousness, trans. Forrest Williams and Robert Kirkpatrick (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, n.d.), p. 100.
25. Lawrence Vogel, The Fragile ‘We’: Ethical Implications of Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’ (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1994).
26. Charles Guignon, ‘Heidegger’ s “Authenticity” Revisited’, Review of Metaphysics 38 (1984), pp. 321-39.
27. Guignon, ‘History and Commitment in the Early Heidegger’, in Heidegger: A Critical Reader, ed. Hubert Dreyfus and Harrison Hall (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992), p. 136.
28. Elizabeth Ewing, ‘Authenticity in Heidegger: A Response to Dreyfus’, Inquiry 38 (1995), pp. 469-87.
29. Joan Stambaugh, ‘An Inquiry into Authenticity and Inauthenticity in Being and Time’, Research in Phenomenology 7 (1977), p. 156.