Return of shoulder girdle function after anterior versus posterior adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2228-2235

  Ritzman, Todd F ^a   Upasani, Vidyadhar V ^b   Pawelek, Jeff B ^c   Betz, Randal R ^d   Newton, Peter O ^b,c,e  

^a AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Effect of surgical approach; Primary thoracic curves; Shoulder girdle function

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FLEXOR REFLEX; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCLE FUNCTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; SHOULDER GIRDLE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; THORAX DEFORMITY; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KYPHOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SCOLIOSIS; SHOULDER; THORACOSCOPY; VERTEBRA;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SCOLIOSIS; SHOULDER JOINT; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; THORACOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 55449122646     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0445     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dwyer A, Schaefer M. Anterior approach to scoliosis. Results of treatment in fifty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56:218-24.
2. Hall J. Dwyer instrumentation in anterior fusion of the spine.J Bone Joint Surg1981;63:188-90.
3. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH 3rd, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999 ;24:225-39.
4. Majd M, Castro FJ, Holt R. Anterior fusion of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;6:696-702.
5. Newton PO, Marks M, Faro F, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in Scoliosis surgery. Spine 2003; 28(suppl20):S249-S54.
6. Newton PO, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ, et al. Anterior release and fusion in pediatric spinal deformity: a comparison of early outcome and cost of thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approaches. Spine 1997;22:1398-hoitR.
7. Reilly C, Slobogean G, Choit R. The efficacy of video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior release and. fusion in the management of pediatric spinal deformities. Can J Surg 2006;49:341-6.
8. Landreneau R, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, et al. Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Tborac Surg 1993;56:1285-9.
9. Burd T, Pawelek L, Lenke L. Upper extremity functional assessment after anterior spinal fusion via thoracotomy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:65-71.
10. Graham E, Lenke L, Lowe T. Prospective pulmonary function evaluation following open thoracotomy for anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:2319-25.
11. Lenke L, Newton PO, Marks M. Prospective pulmonary function compari- son of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2055-60.
12. Li WW, Lee RL, Lee TW, et al. The impact of surgical access on early shoulder function: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus posterolateral thoracotomy. EurJ Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:390-6.
13. Picetti G, Ertl J, Bueff H. Endoscopic instrumentation, correction, and fusion of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2001;1:190-7.
14. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, et al. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005;30(suppl 17):S100-S9.
15. Warner J, Navarro R. Serratus anterior dysfunction. Recognition and treatment, clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;349:139-48.