Is research presented at the scoliosis research society annual meeting influenced by industry funding?

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2208-2212

  Roach, James W ^a   Skaggs, David L ^b   Sponseller, Paul D ^c   MacLeod, Lynne M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORWEGIAN SOCIAL RESEARCH NOVA   (Norway)

Author keywords

Conflict of interest; Industry; Research support; Spine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EMPLOYEE; FUNDING; GENETICS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INDUSTRY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; OCCUPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; UNIVERSITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; STANDARD;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SCOLIOSIS; SOCIETIES, SCIENTIFIC;

EID: 55449120617     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd8f8     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Moses H III, Dorsey ER, Matheson DH, et al. Financial anatomy of biomedical research. JAMA 2005;294:1333-42.
2. Bodenheimer T. Uneasy alliance-clinical investigators and. the pharmaceutical industry. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1539-44.
3. Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, et al. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA 2003;290:921-8.
4. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, et al. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ 2004;170:477-80.
5. Finucane TE, Boult CE. Association of funding and findings of pharmaceutical research at a meeting of a medical professional society. Am J Med 2004;l 17:842-5.
6. Shah RV, Albert TJ, Bruegel-Sanchez V, et al. Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine. Spine 2005;30:1099-104; discussion 1105.
7. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, et al. Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:608-13.
8. Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Wamie WJ, et al. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1010-8.
9. Relman AS. Dealing with conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 1984;310: 1182-3.
10. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Code of Ethics and Professionalism for Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2004.
11. American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Conflicts of Interest: biomedical research. American Medical Association; 1999. Opinion. 8(031).
12. Gartland JJ. The Conflict-of-interest Policy for The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:671.
13. Okike K, MS Kocher. The legal and ethical issues surrounding financial conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:910-3.
14. Boyd EA, Cho MK, Bero LA. Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: issues for clinical investigators. Acad Med 2003;78:769-74.
15. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Standards of Professionalism, Orthopaedist-Industry Conflicts of Interest. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2007.