Measuring the impact of asset complementarities: The case of rural Peru

Cuadernos de Economia - Latin American Journal of Economics

Volumn 42, Issue 125, 2005, Pages 137-164

  Escobal, Javier ^a   Torero, Máximo ^b  

^a Group for the Analysis of Development Lima   (Peru)

^b INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Development; Infrastructure; Poverty trap; Public assets

Indexed keywords

EID: 55449120324     PISSN: 07160046     EISSN: 07176821     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0717-68212005012500007     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Anselin, L. (1990), Estimation Methods for Spatial Autoregressive Structures. Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series Nr. 8, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
2. Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
3. Anselin, L.; A. Varga and A. Zoltan (1996), Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations: A Spatial Econometric Approach. Research Paper No. 9606, Regional Institute and Department of Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
4. Bebbington, A. (1999), "Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty." World Development 27(12): 2021-44.
5. Birdsall, N. and J. L. Londoño (1998), "Assets Inequality Matters," American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May.
6. Deaton, A. (1997), The Analysis of Household Surveys. A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. World Bank, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington D.C.
7. Engerman, S. L. and K. L. Sokoloff, (1998), "Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States?" In: Stephen Haber (ed.) How Latin American Fell Behind: Essays on the Economic Histories of Brazil and Mexico, 1800-1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Escobal, J.; J. Saavedra and M. Torero (1998), Los Activos de los Pobres en el Perũ. Mimeo. Research Report presented to IDB Research Network.
9. Escobal, J. and M. Torero (2000), Does Geography Explain Differences in Economic Growth in Peru? Research Network Working Paper, IDB. Washington D.C.
10. Submitted to the review of Regional Studies, 50.
11. Hardy, A. (1980), "The Role of the Telephone in Economic Development". Telecommunications Policy, 8(1): 23-44.
12. Jalan, J. and M. Ravallion (1998), "Geographic Poverty Traps?" In: Institute for Economic Development Discussion Paper Series, Nr 86, May.
13. Pfeffermann, D. (1993). "The Role of Sampling Weights When Modeling Survey Data". International Statistical Review, 61: 317-337.
14. Ravallion, M. and Q. Wodon (1997), "Poor Areas, Or Only Poor People?" In: Policy Research Working Paper, Nr 1798, World Bank, Washington DC.
15. Saunders, R.; J.J. Warford and B. Wellenius; (1983), " Telecommunications and Economic Development". Second Edition, World Bank, Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
16. Sadoulet, E. and A. de Janvry (1995), Quantitative Development Policy Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Singh, I.; L. Squire and J. Strauss, Eds. (1986), Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank, Baltimore and London.