On building models of spoken-word recognition: When there is as much to learn from natural "oddities" as artificial normality

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1235-1242

  Mattys, Sven L ^a   Liss, Julie M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

HUMANS; LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 55449118269     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1235     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BARD, E. G., SHILLCOCK, R. C., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (1988). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 395-408.
2. BARD, E. G., SOTILLO, C., KELLY, M. L., & AYLETT, M. P. (2001). Taking the hit: Leaving some lexical competition to be resolved postlexically. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 731-737.
3. BERNSTEIN, L. E., & WEISMER, G. (2000). Basic science at the intersection of speech science and communication disorders. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 225-232.
4. CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. G. (1988). The role of stressed syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 113-121.
5. DARLEY, F. L., ARONSON, A. E., & BROWN, J. R. (1969). Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 12, 246-269.
6. DUEZ, D. (1995). On spontaneous French speech: Aspects of the reduction and contextual assimilation of voiced stops. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 407-427.
7. DUFFY, J. (2005). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (2nd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
8. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
9. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
10. GROSJEAN, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
11. HAWKINS, S. (2003) Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 373-405.
12. HAWKINS, S., & SMITH, R. (2001) Polysp: A polysystemic, phoneticallyrich approach to speech understanding. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 13, 99-188.
13. IACONI, A. I., ZIMMERMAN, M. A., KULKARNI, A. S., & BALKRISHNAN, R. (2008). Outcomes associated with pharmacologic treatments in Parkinson's disease: A review of recent literature. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 9, 163-174.
14. KEMPS, R., ERNESTUS, M. T. C., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain & Language, 90, 117-127.
15. LISS, J. M. (2007). The role of speech perception in motor speech disorders. In G. Weismer (Ed.), Motor speech disorders (pp. 187-219). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
16. LISS, J. M., SPITZER, S., CAVINESS, J. N., ADLER, C., & EDWARDS, B. (1998). Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2457-2466.
17. LISS, J. M., SPITZER, S., CAVINESS, J. N., ADLER, C., & EDWARDS, B. (2000). Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 3415-3424.
18. LOGEMAN, J. A., FISHER, H. B., BOSHES, B., & BLONSKY, E. R. (1978). Frequency and cooccurrence of vocal tract dysfunctions in the speech of a large sample of Parkinson patients. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 43, 47-57.
19. LUCE, P. A., & LYONS, E. A. (1998). Processing lexically embedded words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 174-183.
20. LUCE, P. A., MCLENNAN, C. T., & CHARLES-LUCE, J. (2003). Abstractness and specificity in spoken word recognition: Indexical and allophonic variability in long-term repetition priming. In J. Bowers & C. Marsolek (Eds.), Rethinking implicit memory (pp. 197-214). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
22. MCALLISTER, J. (1991). The processing of lexically stressed syllables in read and spontaneous speech. Language & Speech, 34, 1-26.
23. MCLENNAN, C. T., & LUCE, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 306-321.
24. MEHTA, G., & CUTLER, A. (1988). Detection of target phonemes in spontaneous and read speech. Language & Speech, 31, 135-156.
25. MILENKOVIC, P. H. (2004). TF32 [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
26. MULLENNIX, J. W., PISONI, D. B., & MARTIN, C. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
27. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (2007). National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Mission Statement (Sep tember 21, 2007). Retrieved January 20, 2008, from www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/ learn/mission.asp.
28. PISONI, D. B. (1993). Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate, and perceptual learning. Speech Communication, 13, 109-125.
29. RADEAU, M., MORAIS, J., MOUSTY, P., & BERTELSON, P. (2000). The effect of speaking rate on the role of the uniqueness point in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 406-422.
30. SPITZER, S. M., LISS, J. M., & MATTYS, S. L. (2007). Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: A study of resynthesized speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 3678-3687.
31. TIFFANY, W. R. (1959). Nonrandom sources of variation in vowel quality. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 2, 305-317.
32. UCHANSKI, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez, (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207-235). Oxford: Blackwell.
33. VROOMEN, J., & de GELDER, B. (1995). Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 98-108.
34. VROOMEN, J., TUOMAINEN, J., & DE GELDER, B. (1998). The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 133-149.
35. YORKSTON, K. M., STRAND, E. A., & KENNEDY, M. R. (1996). Comprehensibility of dysarthric speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 55-66.