Feasibility of intravenous administration of landiolol hydrochloride for multislice computed tomography coronary angiography - Initial experience

Circulation Journal

Volumn 72, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1814-1820

  Isobe, Satoshi ^a,b   Sato, Kimihide ^a   Sugiura, Kaichiro ^a   Mimura, Takeo ^a   Kobayashi, Mikiko ^a   Meno, Chizuka ^a   Kato, Makoto ^a   Ishii, Hideki ^b   Murohara, Toyoaki ^b  

^a Kami iida Daiichi General Hospital   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Image quality; Landiolol hydrochloride; Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography; Premedication

Indexed keywords

LANDIOLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG STRUCTURE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STENOSIS;

AGED; ANTI-ARRHYTHMIA AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHOLINES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UREA;

EID: 55449116683     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0336     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, Munne A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001; 357: 599-603.
2. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Derlien H, Schulte C, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2535-2538.
3. Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A, Ohnesorge B, Becker A, White C, et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1191-1194.
4. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C, Kuzo R, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography: Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1714-1725.
5. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002; 106: 2051-2054.
6. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003; 107: 664-666.
7. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, Feyer A, Beck T, Brueckner A, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: Initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1230-1237.
8. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, Katoh O, Matsubara T, Terashima M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006; 70: 564-571.
9. Matsumoto N, Sato Y, Yoda S, Nakano Y, Kunimasa T, Matsuo S, et al. Prognostic value of non-obstructive CT low-dense coronary artery plaques detected by multislice computed tomography. Circ J 2007; 71: 1898-1903.
10. Janne d'Othée B, Siebert U, Cury R, Jadvar H, Dunn EJ, Hoffmann U. A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65: 449-461.
11. Kopp AF, Küttner A, Trabold T, Heuschmid M, Schröder S, Claussen CD. MDCT: Cardiology indications. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(Suppl 5): M102-M115.
12. Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Sato K, Tanami Y, Anzai T, Sasaki K, et al. Overview image of the lumen and vessel wall in coronary CT angiography: The plaque-loaded angiographic view. Circ J 2008; 72: 671-673.
13. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, Vos J, Pattynama PM, Krestin GP, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: Impact of heart rate. Heart 2002; 88: 470-474.
14. Flohr T, Prokop M, Becker C, Schoepf UJ, Kopp AF, White RD, et al. A retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT scan and reconstruction technique with suppression of heart pulsation artifacts for cardio-thoracic imaging with extended volume coverage. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1497-1503.
15. Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T, Engelmann K, Ay M, Dogan S, et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: Multidetector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2002; 223: 212-220.
16. Shim SS, Kim Y, Lim SM. Improvement of image quality with β-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 649-654.
17. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 123-127.
18. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51(Suppl 4): 5-40.
19. Reynolds RD, Gorczynski RJ, Quon CY. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of esmolol. J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 26(Suppl A): A3-A14.
20. Barbier GH, Shettigar UR, Appunn DO. Clinical rationale for the use of an ultra-short acting beta-blocker: Esmolol. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 33: 212-218.
21. Atarashi H, Kuruma A, Yashima M, Saitoh H, Ino T, Endoh Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of landiolol hydrochloride, a new ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 68: 143-150.
22. Mizuno J, Yoshiya I, Yokoyama T, Yamada Y, Arita H, Hanaoka K. Age and sex-related differences in dose-dependent hemodynamic response to landiolol hydrochloride during general anesthesia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 243-252.
23. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Suess C, Schoepf UJ, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: Reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1081-1086.
24. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: Effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241: 378-385.
25. Zhang J, Fletcher JG, Scott Harmsen W, Araoz PA, Williamson EE, Primak AN, et al. Analysis of heart rate and heart rate variation during cardiac CT examinations. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 40-48.
26. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Saia F, Lemos PA, McFadden EP, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2265-2270.
27. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Knez A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001; 220: 712-717.
28. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557.