Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1207-1216

  Huddleston, Wendy E ^a   Lewis, James W ^b   Phinney Jr , Raymond E ^c   Deyoe, Edgar A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WHEATON COLLEGE   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; TIME; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55449104712     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1207     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BERMAN, R. A., & COLBY, C. L. (2002). Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT1. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 64-74.
2. BREMMER, F., SCHLACK, A., SHAH, N. J., ZAFIRIS, O., KUBISCHIK, M., HOFFMANN, K., ET AL. (2001). Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: A human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron, 29, 287-296.
3. CAVANAGH, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563-1565.
4. DRIVER, J. (1996). Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 381, 66-68.
5. DRIVER, J., & SPENCE, C. (2000). Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence. Current Biology, 10, R731-R735.
6. EIMER, M., VAN VELZEN, J., & DRIVER, J. (2004). ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 272-288.
7. FARAH, M. J., WONG, A. B., MONHEIT, M. A., & MORROW, L. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia, 27, 461-470.
8. FORT, A., DELPUECH, C., PERNIER, J., & GIARD, M.-H. (2002). Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1031-1039.
9. FRASSINETTI, F., BOLOGNINI, N., & LÀDAVAS, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 332-343.
10. FUJISAKI, W., & NISHIDA, S. (2007). Feature-based processing of audiovisual synchrony perception revealed by random pulse trains. Vision Research, 47, 1075-1093.
11. GIARD, M. H., & PERONNET, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473-490.
12. GOOD, P. (2000). Permutation tests: A practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
13. HUDDLESTON, W. E., & DEYOE, E. A. (2003). First-order and secondorder spectral 'motion' mechanisms in the human auditory system. Perception, 32, 1141-1149.
14. KING, A. J., & CALVERT, G. A. (2001). Multisensory integration: Perceptual grouping by eye and ear. Current Biology, 11, R322-R325.
15. KITAGAWA, N., & ICHIHARA, S. (2002). Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature, 416, 172-174.
16. LAKATOS, S. (1995). The influence of visual cues on the localisation of circular auditory motion. Perception, 24, 457-465.
17. LAKATOS, S., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1997). Constraints common to apparent motion in visual, tactile, and auditory space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1050-1060.
18. LEWIS, J. W., BEAUCHAMP, M. S., & DEYOE, E. A. (2000). A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 873-888.
19. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1995). Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature, 377, 237-239.
20. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: Review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 18, 2331-2370.
21. MACALUSO, E., FRITH, C. D., & DRIVER, J. (2002). Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: Multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 357-368.
22. MCDONALD, J. J., TEDER- SÄLEJÄRVI, W. A., & HILLYARD, S. A. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906-908.
23. MEYER, G. F., WUERGER, S. M., RÖHRBEIN, F., & ZETZSCHE, C. (2005). Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 538-547.
24. SHIMOJO, S., & SHAMS, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505-509.
25. SOTO-FARACO, S., KINGSTONE, A., & SPENCE, C. (2003). Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1847-1862.
26. SOTO-FARACO, S., LYONS, J., GAZZANIGA, M., SPENCE, C., & KINGSTONE, A. (2002). The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 139-146.
27. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1005-1030.
28. VERSTRATEN, F. A. J., & ASHIDA, H. (2005). Attention-based motion perception and motion adaptation: What does attention contribute? Vision Research, 45, 1313-1319.
29. VERSTRATEN, F. A. J., CAVANAGH, P., & LABIANCA, A. T. (2000). Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research, 40, 3651-3664.
30. WARD, L. M., MCDONALD, J. J., & LIN, D. (2000). On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1258-1264.