Human rights and bioethics

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 379-383

  Barilan, Y M ^a,c   Brusa, M ^b,c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MORALITY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY;

ANIMALS; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; FEMALE; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; MALE; MORALS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY;

EID: 55449100822     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020859     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Turoldo F, Barilan YM. The concept of responsibility: three stages in its evolution in bioethics. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2008;17:114-23.
2. Locke J. An essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government. London: Dent, 1924;2 (The second treatise), section 63
3. Dworkin R. Rights as trumps. In: Waldron J, ed. Theories of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
4. Barilan YM. In search for the historical roots of human rights and dignity. Internet Journal of Catholic Bioethics. http://icbbioethics. com. Fall 2007.
5. Santiago-Nino C. The ethics of human rights. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991, ch 1.
6. Hobbes T. Leviathan, 1668. Curley E, ed. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1994.
7. Hart HLA. Are there any natural rights? Philos Rev 1955;64:175-91.
8. Farmer P. Pathologies of power: health, human rights and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
9. UN. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Right 1966, article 2.1 http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm (accessed 13 Mar 2008).
10. Nagel T. The problem of global justice. Philos Public Aff 2005;33:113-47.
11. Sen A. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A, eds. The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
12. nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996:403.
13. Hohfeld WN. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied to judicial reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919.
14. Kramer MH, Simmonds NE, Steiner H. A debate over rights: philosophical enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998:15-16.
15. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
16. Pope Paul the 6th. Encyclical letter: on the development of peoples. 1967. http://www.ewtn.com/library/encyc/p6develo.htm (accessed 13 Mar 2008).
17. Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
18. In: Gruskin S, ed. Perspectives on health and human rights. London: Routledge, 2005.
19. nd ed. Routledge, 2001 (originally printed in 1949).
20. Wise SJ. Rattling the cage: towards legal rights to animals. Cambridge: Perseus, 2000.
21. Barilan YM. Speciesism as a precondition to justice. Politics Life Sci 2005;23:22-33.
22. Beckerman W, Pasek J. Justice, posterity and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001;15-28
23. Rawls J. The laws of peoples. Harvard: Cambridge University Press, 1999;79-80
24. Gracia D. Como arqueros al blanco: estudios de bioética. Madrid: Triacastela, 2004:141-2.
25. Rawls J. Kantian constructivism in moral theory. J Philos 1979;77:515-72.
26. Mahoney J. The challenge of human rights: origins, development and significance. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007:79-80.
27. Steiner H. An essay on rights. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994:33ff.
28. Feinberg J. Harm to self: the moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986:87 and 387n47.
29. Jonsen A. The birth of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998:300.
30. Discussed by Warren MA. Moral status: obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997:217.
31. Wenar L. The nature of rights. Philos Public Aff 2005;33:223-52.
32. Barilan YM. Of doctor patient sex and assisted suicide. Isr Med Assoc J 2003;5:460-3.
33. Sharge L. Abortion and social responsibility: depolarizing the debate. Oxford University Press, 2003: ch 1.
34. see Daniels N. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. J Philos 1979;76:256-82.