Sociometric typologies during adolescence: Contrasting different scoring techniques and formulas;Las tipologías de estatus sociométrico durante la adolescencia: Contraste de distintas técnicas y fórmulas para su cálculo

Psicothema

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 665-671

  Tinoco, Victoria Muñoz ^a,b   Rodríguez, Ma Del Carmen Moreno ^a   Lagares, Irene Jiménez ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b GREI (Grupo de Investigacion del Rechazo Entre Iguales en el Contexte Escolar)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS;

ADOLESCENT; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIOMETRIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 55449100466     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Asher, S.R., y Dodge, K.A. (1986). Identifying children who are reject by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.
2. Asher, S.R., Parker, J.G., y Walker, D.L. (1996). Distinguishing friendship from acceptance: Implications for intervention and assessment. En W.M. Bukowski, A.F. Newcomb y W.W. Hartup (Eds.): The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barrasa, A., y Gil, F. (2004). Un programa informático para el ćalculo y la representatión de índices y valores sociométricos. Psicothema, 16(2), 329-335.
4. Brown, B.B. (2004). Adolescents' relationships with peers. En R.M. Lerner y L. Steinberg (Eds.): Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 364-394). New Jersey: Wiley.
5. Cillessen, A.H.N., y Bukowski, W.M. (2000). Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Cillessen, A.H.N., Van IJzendoorn, H.W., y Van Lieshout, C.F.M.(1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtipes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893-905.
7. Coie, J.D., y Cillessen, A.H.N. (1993). Peer rejection: Origins and effects on children's development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 89-92.
8. Coie, J.D., y Dodge, K.A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quartely, 29, 261-281.
9. Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., y Coppotelli, H.A. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-569.
10. Crick, N.R., y Ladd, G.W. (1989). Nominatior attrition: Does it affect the accuracy of children's sociometric classifications? Merrill-Palmer Quartely, 35, 197-207.
11. Garcia Bacete, F.J. (2006). La identificación de los alumnos rechazados. Comparación de métodos sociométricos de nominaciones bidimensionales. Infancia y Aprendiwje, 29, 437-451.
12. García Bacete, F.J. (2007). La identificación alumnos rechazados, preferidos, ignorados y controvertidos en el aula. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 60(1-2), 25-46.
13. Maassen, G.H., Akkermans, W., y van der Linden, J.L. (1996). Two dimensional sociometric status determination with rating scales. Small Group Research, 27, 56-78.
14. Maassen, G.H., y Landsheer, H.A. (1996). Manual of SSRAT 2.0: A program for two-dimensional sociometric status determination with rating scales. Utrecht: Utrecht University FSW/ISOR Publications, Method Series MS-96-2.
15. Maassen, G.H., y Landsheer, H.A. (1998). SSRAT: The processing or rating scales for the determination of two-dimensional sociometric status. Behavior Researh Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 674-679.
16. Maassen, G.H., Steenbeek, H., y van Geert, P. (2004). Stability of three methods for two-dimensional sociometric status determination based on the procedure of Asher, Singleton, Tinsley and Hymel. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 535-550.
17. Masten, A.S., Morison, P., y Pellegrini, D.S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533.
18. McConnell, S.R., y Odom, S.L. (1986). Sociometrics: Peer-referenced measures and assessment of social competence. En P.S. Strain, M.J. Guraknick y H.M, Walker (Eds.): Children's Social Behavior. Orlando: Academic Press.
19. Moreno, J.L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, D.C.: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
20. Muñoz Tinoco, V. (2004). Las técnicas sociométricas y sus correlatos conductuales en la investigación evolutiva. Trabajo de investigacion realizado para la obtención del Diploma de Estudios Avanzados. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Sevilla.
21. Newcomb, A.F., y Bukowski, W.M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of Children's Peer Group Status. Developmental Psychology, 9, 856-867.
22. Terry, R., y Coie, J.D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 867-880.