Dharma in practice: Ācāra and authority in medieval dharmaśāstra

Journal of Indian Philosophy

Volumn 32, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 813-830

  Davis Jr , Donald R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55449094652     PISSN: 00221791     EISSN: 15730395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10781-004-8651-4     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Altekar, A.S. (1952). Sources of Hindu Dharma in its Socio-Religious Aspects. Sain Das Foundation Lectures. Sholapur, Institute of Public Administration.
2. Bhattacharya, N. (1996). Remaking Custom: The Discourse & Practice of Colonial Codification. In R. Champakalakshmi and S. Gopal (eds), Tradition, Dissent, and Ideology: Essays in Honor of Romila Thapar. Delhi: OUP.
3. Blackstone, W. (1765-1769 [1979]). Commentaries on the Laws of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765-1769. 4 Vols. Chicago: University of California Press.
4. Chakravarty-Kaul, M. (1996). Common Lands and Customary Law: Institutional Change in North India over the Past Two Centuries. Delhi: OUP.
5. Correas, Ó. (1994). La teoría general del derecho frente al derecho indígena. Crítica Juridica 14, 15-31.
6. Davis, Jr. D.R. (1999). Recovering the indigenous legal traditions of India: classical Hindu law in practice in late medieval Kerala. Journal of Indian Philosophy 27(3), 159-213.
7. Davis, Jr. D.R. (2002). Dharma, Maryāda, and law in early British Malabar: remarks on words for 'law' in the Tellicherry records. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 23, 51-70.
8. Derrett, J.D.M. (1977). The development of the concept of property in India c. A.D. 800-1800. Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill, [orig. pub. 1962].
9. Deshpande, M.M. (1993). Sanskrit and Prakrit: Sociolinguistic Issues. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
10. Dickinson, J. (1929). The law behind the law. 29 Columbia Law Review 113-146, 285-319.
11. Ganapati Sastri, T. (ed.) (1921-1922 [1982]). The Yājñ avalkyasmr{ring operator}ti with the commentary Bālakrīd{dot below}ā of Viśvarūpāchārya. Delhi: Munishiram Manoharlal.
12. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: fact and law in comparative perspective, rpt. in Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
13. Glenn, H.P. (1997). The capture, reconstruction, and marginalization of 'custom.' American Journal of Comparative Law 45, 613.
14. Halbfass, W. (1988). India and Europe: An Essay in Philosophical Understanding. Albany: SUNY Press.
15. Hale, M. (1713 [2002]). In Charles M. Gray (ed.), The History of the Common Law in England. Chicago: University of Clifornia Press.
16. Hume, D. (1748 [1999]). In L. Tom (ed.), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford UP.
17. Jain, M.P. (1963). Custom as a source of law in India. Jaipur Law Journal 3, 96-130. [rpt. in Renteln and Dundes 1994].
18. Jha, G. (1916). The Pūrva Mimām{dot below}sa Sūtras of Jaimini: Chapters I-III. trans, with an original commentary. Allahabad: The Pānini Office, Bhuvaneśwarī Āśrama.
19. Jha, G. (trans.) (1983). Tantravārttika of Kumārila Bhatta: a commentary on Śahara's bhās{dot below}ya on the Pūrvamīmām{dot below}sāsūtras of Jamini. Delhi: Sri Satguru, 1983 [orig. pub. 1924].
20. Jha, G. (ed. and trans.) (1920-1939 [1999]). Manusmr{ring operator}ti with the 'Manubhās{dot below}ya' of Medhātithi. 10 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
21. Joshi, L.S. (ed.) (1937). Dharmakośa. Vol 1. Pt. 1. Vyavahārakān{dot below}d{dot below}a. Wai: Prājña- Pāt{dot below}ha-Śālā-Mandala.
22. Joshi, L.S. (ed.) (1988). Dharmakośa. Vol. 5. Pt. 1. Varn{dot below}āsramadharmakān{dot below}d{dot below}a. Wai: Prājña-Pātha-Śālā-Mandala.
23. Kane, P.V. (1930-1962).' History of Dharmaśāstra. 5 Vols. Poona: BORI. [Vol. 3 pub. 1946; Vol. 5 pub. 1962].
24. Lariviere, R.W. (1997). Dharmaśāstra, Custom, 'Real Law,' and 'Apocryphal' Smr{dot below}tis, Recht, Staat, und Verwaltung im klassischen Indien. ed. Bernhard Kölver. Munich: R. Oldenbourg [also in the present volume].
25. Lariviere, R.W. (1989). Nāradasmr{ring operator}ti: A Critical Edition. 2 Vols. Philadelphia: South Asian Regional Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
26. Lingat, R. (1973). 77?e Classical Law of India, trans. J.D.M. Derrett. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Lingat, R. (1962). Les Quatre Pieds due Procés. Journal Asiatique 250, 489-503.
28. Mandlik, Vishwanath Narayan 1880 [1982]. Vyavahara Mayukha or Hindu Law. New Delhi: Asian Publication Services.
29. Moore, S.F. (1978). Law as Process. London: Routledge.
30. Moore, S.F. (1986). Social Facts and Fabrications: 'Customary' law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
31. Olivelle, P. (trans.) (1999). Dharmasūtras: The Law Codes of Ancient India. Oxford: Oxford UP.
32. Olivelle, P. (forthcoming). Mānavadharmaśāstra. crit. ed. and trans. New York: Oxford UP.
33. Parpola, M. (2001). Kerala Brahmins in Transition. A Study of a Namputiri Family. Studia Orientalia 91. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society.
34. Pospisil, L. (1974). The Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New Haven: HRAF Press.
35. Renteln, A.D. and Dundes, A. (eds) (1994). Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta. 2 Vols. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36. Sarkar, K.L. (1909). The Mimansa Rule of Interpretation as applied to Hindu Law. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink.
37. Shama Shastry, R. (ed.) (1927). Sarasvatīvilāsa. Vyavahārakānda. Mysore: Gov't Branch Press.
38. Simpson, A.W.B. (1973). The common law and legal theory. In Simpson, A.W.B. (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. 2nd Series. Oxford: OUP.
39. Tamburān, K.K. (ed.) (1906). Śā̇karasmr{ring operator}ti (Laghudharmaprakāśikā). Trśś ivapērūr: Bhāratavilāsam{dot below}.
40. Vollenhoven, C.V. (1927). Aspects of the controversy on customary law in India. The Asiatic Review 23, 113-128 [rpt. in Renteln and Dundes 1994].
41. Watson, A. (1984). An approach to customary law. University of Illinois Law Review 561-576.
42. Wezler, A. (1985). Dharma und Deśadharma. In H. Kulke, et al. (eds), Regionale Tradition in Sudasien. Beiträge zur Sü dasienforschung. Bd. 104. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1-22.
43. Wezler, A. (1999). Über den sakramentalen Charakter des Dharma. In G. Oberhammer & M. Schmücker (eds.), Raum-zeitliche Vermittlung der Transzendenz: Zur 'sakramentalen Dimension religöser Tradition. Wien: Der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [also translated into English in the present volume].