Transit-oriented development in the Sun Belt

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1552, 1997, Pages 145-153

  Messenger, Todd ^a   Ewing, Reid ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5544309535     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cervero, R. Design Guidelines as a Tool to Promote Transit-Supportive Development. In Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects, Technology Sharing Program, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993, pp. 27-40.
2. Everett, D., T. Herrero, and R. Ewing. Transit-Oriented Development Guidelines - Review of Literature. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 1995.
3. Pushkarev, B. S., and J. M. Zupan. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1975.
4. Levinson, H. S., and F. H. Wynn. Effects of Density on Urban Transportation Requirements. In Highway Research Record 2, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1963, pp. 38-64.
5. Guest, A. M., and C. Cluett. Analysis of Transit Ridership Using 1970 Census Data. Traffic Quarterly, Vol. 30, 1976, pp. 143-161.
6. Spillar, R. J., and G. S. Rutherford. The Effects of Population Density and Income on Per Capita Transit Ridership in Western American Cities. ITE 1990 Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 327-331.
7. Newman, P. W. G., and J. R. Kenworthy. Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook. Gower Technical, Brookfield, Vt., 1991, pp. 34-68.
8. Tomazinis, A. R., et al. A Study on Factors Affecting Success of Suburban Mass Transit Lines. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C., 1979, pp. 59-85.
9. Cervero, R. Land Use and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 45, 1991, pp. 479-491.
10. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Management Strategies on Commuting Behavior. Technology Sharing Program, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994.
11. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade Douglas, Inc. The Pedestrian Environment, Volume 4A. 1000 Friends of Oregon, Portland, 1993, pp. 5-21.
12. Cervero, R. Evidence on Travel Behavior in Transit-Supportive Residential Neighborhoods. Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects, Technology Sharing Program, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 127-163.
13. Sasaki Associates, Inc. Transit and Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhoods. Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Silver Spring, 1993, pp. 47-53.
14. Friedman, B., S. P. Gordon, and J. B. Peers. Effect of Neotraditional Neighborhood Design on Travel Characteristics. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 63-70.
15. Neels, K., et al. An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Land Use on Urban Travel. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 63-65.
16. Frank, L. D., and G. Pivo. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, Walking. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 44-52.
17. Frank, L. D., and G. Pivo. Relationships Between Land Use and Travel Behavior in the Puget Sound Region. Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, 1994, pp. 14-34.
18. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Model Modifications, Volume 4. 1000 Friends of Oregon, Portland, 1992.
19. Cervero, R. Rail-Oriented Office Development in California: How Successful? Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 48, 1994, pp. 33-44.
20. Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.
21. Ewing, R. Ridership Analysis - Urban Design Features. In Pedestrian and Transit-Friendly Design, Appendix C, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 1996.
22. Pas, E. I. An Empirical Comparison of Zonal, Household, and Personal Models of Home-Based Trip Generation. Traffic and Engineering Control, Vol. 19, Feb. 1978, pp. 64-68.
23. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Transit and Urban Form. Phase I. Transit Cooperative Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 54.